Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35939350›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2022

Tidal Volume and Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Postoperative Hypoxemia during General Anesthesia: A Single-center Multiple Crossover Factorial Cluster Trial.

Alparslan Turan, Wael Ali Sakr Esa, Eva Rivas, Jiayi Wang, Omer Bakal, Samantha Stamper, Ehab Farag, Kamal Maheswari, Guangmei Mao, Kurt Ruetzler and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alparslan TuranDepartment of Outcomes Research and Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Wael Ali Sakr EsaDepartment of Outcomes Research and Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Eva RivasDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, The August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jiayi WangDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Omer BakalDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Samantha StamperDepartment of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ehab FaragDepartment of Outcomes Research and Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Kamal MaheswariDepartment of Outcomes Research and Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Guangmei MaoDepartment of Quantitative Health Science, Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio.
Kurt RuetzlerDepartment of Outcomes Research and Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Daniel I SesslerDepartment of Outcomes Research and Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ventilation-PEEP Trial Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative mechanical ventilation is a major component of general anesthesia. The extent to which various intraoperative tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) effect on postoperative hypoxia and lung injury remains unclear. We hypothesized that adults having orthopedic surgery, ventilation using different tidal volumes and PEEP levels affect the oxygenation within first hour in the postoperative care unit.

methodsWe conducted a two-by-two factorial crossover cluster trial at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus. We enrolled patients having orthopedic surgery with general anesthesia who were assigned to factorial clusters with tidal volumes of 6 or 10 ml/kg of predicted body weight and to PEEP of 5 or 8 cm H2O in 1-week clusters. The primary outcome was the effect of tidal volume or PEEP on time-weighted average peripheral oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry divided by the fraction of inspired oxygen (Spo2/Fio2 ratio) during the initial postoperative hour.

resultsWe enrolled 2,860 patients who had general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery from September 2018 through October 2020. The interaction between tidal volume and PEEP was not significant (P = 0.565). The mean ± SD time-weighted average of Spo2/Fio2 ratio was 353 ± 47 and not different in patients assigned to high and low tidal volume (estimated effect, 3.5%; 97.5% CI, -0.4% to 7.3%; P = 0.042), for those assigned to high and low PEEP (estimated effect, -0.2%; 97.5% CI, -4.0% to 3.6%; P = 0.906). We did not find significant difference in ward Spo2/Fio2 ratio, pulmonary complications, and duration of hospitalization among patients assigned to various tidal volumes and PEEP levels.

conclusionsAmong adults having major orthopedic surgery, postoperative oxygenation is similar, with tidal volumes between 6 and 10 ml/kg and PEEP between 5 and 8 cm H2O. Our results suggest that any combination of tidal volumes between 6 and 10 ml/kg and PEEP between 5 versus 8 ml cm H2O can be used safely for orthopedic surgery. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralPositive-Pressure RespirationAdultHumansHypoxiaOxygenTidal VolumeOxygen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.