Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35939268›Full record

ArticleAperture neuro2021

BrainIAK: The Brain Imaging Analysis Kit.

Manoj Kumar, Michael J Anderson, James W Antony, Christopher Baldassano, Paula P Brooks, Ming Bo Cai, Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen, Cameron T Ellis, Gregory Henselman-Petrusek, David Huberdeau and 28 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aperture neuro, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multisensory coding of audiovisual movies in the human hippocampus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Conceptual Knowledge Shapes the Neural Representations of Learned Faces in Non-Visual Regions of the Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Early Neural Development of Social Interaction Perception: Evidence from Voxel-Wise Encoding in Young Children and Adults.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Neural Representations of Concreteness and Concrete Concepts Are Specific to the Individual.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. High-level cognition is supported by information-rich but compressible brain activity patterns.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Unconscious Manipulation of Conceptual Representations with Decoded Neurofeedback Impacts Search Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An In-depth Exploration of the Interplay between fMRI Methods and Theory in Cognitive Neuroscience.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Manoj KumarPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Michael J AndersonWork done while at Parallel Computing Lab, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA.
James W AntonyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Christopher BaldassanoDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, NY, NY.
Paula P BrooksPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Ming Bo CaiInternational Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), UTIAS, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Po-Hsuan Cameron ChenWork done while at Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Cameron T EllisDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Gregory Henselman-PetrusekPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
David HuberdeauDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
J Benjamin HutchinsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Y Peeta LiDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Qihong LuDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Jeremy R ManningDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
Anne C MennenPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Samuel A NastasePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Hugo RichardParietal Team, Inria, Neurospin, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, France.
Anna C SchapiroDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Nicolas W SchuckMax Planck Research Group NeuroCode, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Michael ShvartsmanWork done while at Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Narayanan SundaramWork done while at Parallel Computing Lab, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA.
Daniel SuoDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Javier S TurekBrain-Inspired Computing Lab, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR.
David TurnerPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Vy A VoBrain-Inspired Computing Lab, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR.
Grant WallacePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Yida WangWork done while at Parallel Computing Lab, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA.
Jamal A WilliamsPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Hejia ZhangWork done while at Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Xia ZhuBrain-Inspired Computing Lab, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR.
Mihai CapotăBrain-Inspired Computing Lab, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR.
Jonathan D CohenPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Uri HassonPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Kai LiDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Peter J RamadgeDepartment of Electrical Engineering, and the Center for Statistics and Machine Learning, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Nicholas B Turk-BrowneDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Theodore L WillkeBrain-Inspired Computing Lab, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR.
Kenneth A NormanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Princeton University · USIntel (United States) · USYale University · USUniversity of Oregon · USColumbia University · USDartmouth College · USMax Planck Institute for Human Development · DEThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

NRSA Training Grant in Quantitative NeuroscienceT32MH065214 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Nathaniel Douglass Daw, KENNETH A NORMAN · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
Cloud-based Software Framework to Simplify and Standardize Real-Time fMRIRF1MH125318 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, JONATHAN D, NORMAN, KENNETH A · 2020 to 2020
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH125318NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH065214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) offers a rich source of data for studying the neural basis of cognition. Here, we describe the Brain Imaging Analysis Kit (BrainIAK), an open-source, free Python package that provides computationally optimized solutions to key problems in advanced fMRI analysis. A variety of techniques are presently included in BrainIAK: intersubject correlation (ISC) and intersubject functional connectivity (ISFC), functional alignment via the shared response model (SRM), full correlation matrix analysis (FCMA), a Bayesian version of representational similarity analysis (BRSA), event segmentation using hidden Markov models, topographic factor analysis (TFA), inverted encoding models (IEMs), an fMRI data simulator that uses noise characteristics from real data (fmrisim), and some emerging methods. These techniques have been optimized to leverage the efficiencies of high-performance compute (HPC) clusters, and the same code can be se amlessly transferred from a laptop to a cluster. For each of the aforementioned techniques, we describe the data analysis problem that the technique is meant to solve and how it solves that problem; we also include an example Jupyter notebook for each technique and an annotated bibliography of papers that have used and/or described that technique. In addition to the sections describing various analysis techniques in BrainIAK, we have included sections describing the future applications of BrainIAK to real-time fMRI, tutorials that we have developed and shared online to facilitate learning the techniques in BrainIAK, computational innovations in BrainIAK, and how to contribute to BrainIAK. We hope that this manuscript helps readers to understand how BrainIAK might be useful in their research.

Indexed as

fMRI analysisfMRI simulatorhigh-performance computingmachine learningMVPAtutorials

Identifiers

PMID35939268
PMCPMC9351935
OpenAlexW4205155404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.