Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35939205›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2023

MedDRA Labeling Groupings to Improve Safety Communication in Product Labels.

Ilona Große-Michaelis, Scott Proestel, Radhika M Rao, Brian S Dillman, Silvia Bader-Weder, Lynn Macdonald, William Gregory

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ilona Große-MichaelisBayer AG, Research & Development, Pharmaceuticals, Leverkusen, Germany.
Scott ProestelThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, USA.
Radhika M RaoAbbVie, Pharmacovigilance and Patient Safety, North Chicago, USA. Radhika.Rao@abbvie.com.
Brian S DillmanEli Lilly and Company, Lilly Research Laboratories, Global Patient Safety - Medical, Indianapolis, USA.
Silvia Bader-WederF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Pharma Development, Safety, Basel, Switzerland.
Lynn MacdonaldIndependent, CIOMS MedDRA Labeling Grouping Expert Working Group, Ottawa, Canada.
William GregoryPfizer, Worldwide Safety and Regulatory, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The granularity and structure of the International Council for Harmonisation's (ICH) Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) are useful for precise coding of adverse events (AEs) for data analysis. In product labeling for healthcare practitioners, however, the granularity of MedDRA Preferred Terms (PTs) can obscure the communication of adverse reactions (ARs). Driven by a focus on patient safety, business needs, and regulatory guidance, many sponsors and regulators have begun to develop institution-specific approaches to clustering similar AR terms in medical product prescribing information on a product-by-product basis. However, there are no agreed upon conventions that describe which AR terms may be appropriate to group together. In order to improve safety communication to patients and healthcare providers, there is an urgent need for a harmonized international approach to the creation and use of groups of MedDRA PTs which we refer to as "MedDRA Labeling Groupings (MLGs)" in medical product prescribing information. Given its long-standing contributions towards the design of Standardised MedDRA Queries (SMQs), the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) convened an Expert Working Group (EWG) with involvement of multiple major stakeholders to produce a consensus document on principles and points to consider in the development of MLGs. The CIOMS MLG EWG identified variations in grouping of MedDRA PTs in product labels, and in the current document, proposes a strategy for improving the communication of drug safety labeling. It is envisaged that the use of these consensus recommendations would be voluntary and applied to product labels in a manner that is consistent with existing regulatory frameworks.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsCommunicationDrug LabelingHumansProduct LabelingAdverse reactionsICHMedDRAMedDRA Labeling Groupings (MLG)Product labels

Identifiers

PMID35939205
PMCPMC9810671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.