ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2023
MedDRA Labeling Groupings to Improve Safety Communication in Product Labels.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Severe cutaneous adverse reactions linked to medications in children and adolescents: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- From class effects to specificity FAERS evidence and network mapping of adverse events in NSCLC targeted therapy.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- FAERS database reveals latent signals of neuro-ophthalmic toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: feature mining and clinical warnings.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A real-world study of ublituximab based on the WHO-VigiAccess and U.S. food and drug administration's adverse event reporting system databases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Aggregation of Adverse Event Terms for Signal Detection and Labeling in Clinical Trials.Drug safety · 2025Article
- PGxDB: an interactive web-platform for pharmacogenomics research.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-induced hyponatremia: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis using FAERS database.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Conducting and interpreting disproportionality analyses derived from spontaneous reporting systems.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The granularity and structure of the International Council for Harmonisation's (ICH) Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) are useful for precise coding of adverse events (AEs) for data analysis. In product labeling for healthcare practitioners, however, the granularity of MedDRA Preferred Terms (PTs) can obscure the communication of adverse reactions (ARs). Driven by a focus on patient safety, business needs, and regulatory guidance, many sponsors and regulators have begun to develop institution-specific approaches to clustering similar AR terms in medical product prescribing information on a product-by-product basis. However, there are no agreed upon conventions that describe which AR terms may be appropriate to group together. In order to improve safety communication to patients and healthcare providers, there is an urgent need for a harmonized international approach to the creation and use of groups of MedDRA PTs which we refer to as "MedDRA Labeling Groupings (MLGs)" in medical product prescribing information. Given its long-standing contributions towards the design of Standardised MedDRA Queries (SMQs), the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) convened an Expert Working Group (EWG) with involvement of multiple major stakeholders to produce a consensus document on principles and points to consider in the development of MLGs. The CIOMS MLG EWG identified variations in grouping of MedDRA PTs in product labels, and in the current document, proposes a strategy for improving the communication of drug safety labeling. It is envisaged that the use of these consensus recommendations would be voluntary and applied to product labels in a manner that is consistent with existing regulatory frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.