Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35939126›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2022

Scoping review of recent evidence on the management of pediatric urolithiasis: summary of meta-analyses, systematic reviews and relevant randomized controlled trials.

Michael E Chua, Jin Kyu Kim, Jessica M Ming, Keara N De Cotiis, Stephen S Yang, Mandy Rickard, Armando J Lorenzo, Joana Dos Santos

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael E Chua *Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. auhc_ekim@yahoo.com.
Jin Kyu Kim *Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jessica M MingDepartment of Urology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Keara N De CotiisDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stephen S YangDivision of Urology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, New Taipei Branch, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Mandy RickardDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Armando J LorenzoDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Joana Dos SantosDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review aimed to evaluate and summarize the recent 10 year pediatric urolithiasis literature with a particular focus on systematic reviews, randomized-controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analysis. The systematic literature search performed on September 1, 2021, restricted to the recent 10 years, focused on pediatric urolithiasis that are RCTs, meta-analysis and systematic reviews. The summarized literature included etiology, diagnostics, medical and surgical management. GRADE criteria are used to evaluate and standardize the reporting of evidence quality. A total of 33 relevant articles were included. The recent high-level studies included topics of genetic and diet association with pediatric stone formation, diagnostic assessment, medical management intervention including medical dissolution and expulsion therapy. The study extended to include the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery. However, evidence quality was ranked "very-low" or "low". Based on the GRADE criteria downgrading of the quality level was due to heterogeneity and low precision. A majority of the RCTs were categorized as having a "high" to "uncertain" risk of bias. The relevant RCTs, meta-analyses and systematic reviews within the past decade are of low quality. Consequently, the research provided no clear evidence-based recommendations for managing pediatric urolithiasis. More rigorous research and high-quality studies are needed to determine the best practices.

Indexed as

LithotripsyNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousUrolithiasisChildHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicEvidence-based medicinePediatricScoping reviewUrolithiasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.