Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022
Evaluation of post laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain after subcutaneous injection of lidocaine at port site versus lidocaine spray on gallbladder bed after cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe efficacy of intraperitoneal (IP) and incisional use of local anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a promising subject regarding post-operative pain control. In this study, we aim to compare these methods using lidocaine as the local anesthetic.
methodsThis study was a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eighty-two patients, candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were included. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups; the instillation group and the infiltration group. In the instillation group, a 2% lidocaine ampule was instilled in the gallbladder bed after removal of the gallbladder. In the infiltration group, a 2% lidocaine ampule was injected subcutaneously into the port sites before making the incisions for the insertion of laparoscopic ports.
resultsThe mean age of patients were 41.66 ± 14.44 and 48.05 ± 17.03 years in the instillation and infiltration groups, respectively. The etiologies recorded in this study were: acute calculous cholecystitis (29.3%), symptomatic gallstone (68.3%), and polyp (2.4). The pain severity, evaluated at six different times, from immediately after awakening from anesthesia to 24 h after the operation, was not significantly different between the two groups (p-value = 0.329). Consumption of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and narcotics, were statistically lower in the instillation group (p-value = 0.013 and 0.003, respectively). However, hospitalization period, time spent to return to normal bowel movements and oral diet, and postoperative nausea/vomiting were not significantly significant between the groups.
conclusionIP instillation of lidocaine following laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers post-operative pain relief and is associated with lower analgesic consumption in comparison to subcutaneous injection of this agent at the port site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.