Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35938916›Full record

ReviewEndocrine-related cancer2022

Succinate dehydrogenase and MYC-associated factor X mutations in pituitary neuroendocrine tumours.

Paul Benjamin Loughrey, Federico Roncaroli, Estelle Healy, Philip Weir, Madhu Basetti, Ruth T Casey, Steven J Hunter, Márta Korbonits

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine-related cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 5 due to Germline MAX Mutations: A Systematic Review of Tumor Spectrum and Clinical Features.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Genetics of familial acromegaly and pituitary gigantism.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Paul Benjamin LoughreyPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5491-6730
Federico RoncaroliGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Medicine, Manchester University, Manchester, UK.
Estelle HealyDepartment of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Philip WeirDepartment of Neurosurgery, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Madhu BasettiCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5844-856X
Ruth T CaseyDepartment of Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Steven J HunterRegional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Márta KorbonitsCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4101-9432
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) associated with paragangliomas or phaeochromocytomas are rare. SDHx variants are estimated to be associated with 0.3-1.8% of PitNETs. Only a few case reports have documented the association with MAX variants. Prolactinomas are the most common PitNETs occurring in patients with SDHx variants, followed by somatotrophinomas, clinically non-functioning tumours and corticotrophinomas. One pituitary carcinoma has been described. SDHC, SDHB and SDHA mutations are inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion and tumorigenesis seems to adhere to Knudson's two-hit hypothesis. SDHD and SDHAF2 mutations most commonly have paternal inheritance. Immunohistochemistry for SDHB or MAX and loss of heterozygosity analysis can support the assessment of pathogenicity of the variants. Metabolomics is promising in the diagnosis of SDHx-related disease. Future research should aim to further clarify the role of SDHx and MAX variants or other genes in the molecular pathogenesis of PitNETs, including pseudohypoxic and kinase signalling pathways along with elucidating epigenetic mechanisms to predict tumour behaviour.

Indexed as

Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsParagangliomaPituitary NeoplasmsBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsFactor XGerm-Line MutationHumansMutationSuccinate DehydrogenaseBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsFactor XMyc associated factor XSuccinate DehydrogenaseMAXparagangliomaphaeochromocytomapituitary neuroendocrine tumourSDHsuccinate dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID35938916
PMCPMC9513646
OpenAlexW4290643632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.