Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35938880›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

Real-Time Risk Score for Glaucoma Mass Screening by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Development and Validation.

Kota Fukai, Ryo Terauchi, Takahiko Noro, Shumpei Ogawa, Tomoyuki Watanabe, Toru Nakagawa, Toru Honda, Yuya Watanabe, Yuko Furuya, Takeshi Hayashi and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Pattern-Based OCT Metric for Glaucoma Detection.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kota FukaiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ryo TerauchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiko NoroDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shumpei OgawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoyuki WatanabeDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toru NakagawaHitachi Health Care Center, Ibaraki, Japan.
Toru HondaHitachi Health Care Center, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yuya WatanabeHitachi Health Care Center, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yuko FuruyaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takeshi HayashiHitachi Health Care Center, Ibaraki, Japan.
Masayuki TatemichiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tadashi NakanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Jikei University School of Medicine · JPHitachi (Japan) · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a risk score assessable in real-time using only retinal thickness-related values measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography alone for use in population-based glaucoma mass screenings. Methods: A total of 7572 participants (aged 35-74 years) underwent spectral domain optical coherence tomography examination annually between 2016 to 2021 in a population-based setting. We selected 284 glaucoma cases and 284 controls, matched by age and sex, from 11,487 scans in 2016. We conducted multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise selection of retinal thickness-related variables to develop the diagnostic models. The developed risk scores were applied to all participants in 2018 (9720 eyes), and we randomly selected 723 scans for validation. Additional validation using the Humphrey field analyzer was conducted on 129 eyes in 2020. We assessed the models using sensitivity, specificity, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and positive and negative predictive values. Results: The best-predicting model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.98) with a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.91. The validation dataset showed a positive predictive value of 90.8% for high-risk scorers, corresponding to 6.2% of the population, and negative predictive value of 88.2% for low-risk scorers, corresponding to 85.2%. Sensitivity and specificity for glaucoma diagnosis were 0.85 and 0.91, when we set the risk score cut-off at 90 points out of 100. Conclusions: This risk score could be used as a valid index for glaucoma screening in a population-based setting. Translational Relevance: The score is feasible by installing a simple computer application on an existing spectral domain optical coherence tomography and will help to improve the accuracy and efficiency of glaucoma screening.

Indexed as

GlaucomaOptic DiskHumansMass ScreeningNerve FibersRetinal Ganglion CellsRisk FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID35938880
PMCPMC9366724
OpenAlexW4290643191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.