Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35938527›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Automated slice-specific z-shimming for functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human spinal cord.

Merve Kaptan, S Johanna Vannesjo, Toralf Mildner, Ulrike Horn, Ronald Hartley-Davies, Valeria Oliva, Jonathan C W Brooks, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Jürgen Finsterbusch, Falk Eippert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Merve KaptanMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8187-4911
S Johanna VannesjoDepartment of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2432-4192
Toralf MildnerMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Ulrike HornMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9119-0468
Ronald Hartley-DaviesDepartment of Medical Physics, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston, Bristol, UK.
Valeria OlivaSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7849-191X
Jonathan C W BrooksSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia Wellcome Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre (UWWBIC), Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3335-6209
Nikolaus WeiskopfMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5239-1881
Jürgen FinsterbuschDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Falk EippertMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3986-1719
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DENorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N026969/1Wellcome Trust 203963/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the human spinal cord faces many challenges, such as signal loss due to local magnetic field inhomogeneities. This issue can be addressed with slice-specific z-shimming, which compensates for the dephasing effect of the inhomogeneities using a slice-specific gradient pulse. Here, we aim to address outstanding issues regarding this technique by evaluating its effects on several aspects that are directly relevant for spinal fMRI and by developing two automated procedures in order to improve upon the time-consuming and subjective nature of manual selection of z-shims: one procedure finds the z-shim that maximizes signal intensity in each slice of an EPI reference-scan and the other finds the through-slice field inhomogeneity for each EPI-slice in field map data and calculates the required compensation gradient moment. We demonstrate that the beneficial effects of z-shimming are apparent across different echo times, hold true for both the dorsal and ventral horn, and are also apparent in the temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) of EPI time-series data. Both of our automated approaches were faster than the manual approach, lead to significant improvements in gray matter tSNR compared to no z-shimming and resulted in beneficial effects that were stable across time. While the field-map-based approach performed slightly worse than the manual approach, the EPI-based approach performed as well as the manual one and was furthermore validated on an external corticospinal data-set (N > 100). Together, automated z-shimming may improve the data quality of future spinal fMRI studies and lead to increased reproducibility in longitudinal studies.

Indexed as

ArtifactsEcho-Planar ImagingBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSpinal Cordautomated z-shimfunctional magnetic resonance imagingmagnetic field inhomogeneitiessignal lossspinal cordtemporal signal-to-noise ratio

Identifiers

PMID35938527
PMCPMC9704784
OpenAlexW4290633165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.