Trial reportDiabetes/metabolism research and reviews2022
A novel model for detecting advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Trial report in Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel model for detecting advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2022Trial
- Beyond bones and stones: the relationship between hyperparathyroidism and diabetes.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Liver stiffness measurements in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: Updates on the method effectiveness and perspectives.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Comparing FIB-4, VCTE, pSWE, 2D-SWE, and MRE Thresholds and Diagnostic Accuracies for Detecting Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with MASLD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Hybrid XGBoost model with hyperparameter tuning for prediction of liver disease with better accuracy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe study aimed to develop a novel noninvasive model to detect advanced fibrosis based on routinely available clinical and laboratory tests. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 309 patients who underwent liver biopsy were randomly divided into the estimation group (n = 201) and validation group (n = 108). The model was developed using multiple regression analysis in the estimation group and further verified in the validation group. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
resultsThe model was named NAFLD Fibrosis Index (NFI): -10.844 + 0.046 × age - 0.01 × platelet count + 0.19 × 2h postprandial plasma glucose (PG) + 0.294 × conjugated bilirubin - 0.015 × ALT + 0.039 × AST + 0.109 × total iron binding capacity -0.033 × parathyroid hormone (PTH). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of NFI was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.93, p < 0.001) in the estimation group and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69-0.91, p < 0.001) in the validation group, higher than NFS, FIB4, APRI, and BARD, and similar to FibroScan (NFI AUC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.89, p = 0.001 vs. FibroScan AUC = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62-0.90, p = 0.002). By applying the low cut-off value (-2.756), advanced fibrosis could be excluded among 49.3% and 48% of patients in the estimation group (sensitivity: 93.1%, NPV: 97.9%, specificity: 55.2%, and PPV: 26.0%) and validation group (sensitivity: 81.3%, NPV: 94.2%, specificity: 53.3%, and PPV: 23.2%), respectively, allowing them to avoid liver biopsy.
conclusionsThe study has established a novel model for advanced fibrosis, the diagnostic accuracy of which is superior to the current clinical scoring systems and is similar to FibroScan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.