Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35938069›Full record

ArticleOpen journal of statistics2021

Modeling Individual Patient Count/Rate Data over Time with Applications to Cancer Pain Flares and Cancer Pain Medication Usage.

George J Knafl, Salimah H Meghani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open journal of statistics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George J KnaflSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Salimah H MeghaniDepartment of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

The Role of Opioid Adherence Profiles in Cancer Pain Self-Management and OutcomesR01NR017853 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEGHANI, SALIMAH H. · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
A Novel Approach to Elucidate Mechanisms for Disparity in Cancer Pain OutcomesRC1NR011591 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEGHANI, SALIMAH H. · 2009 to 2010
$846k
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR017853NINR NIH HHS RC1 NR011591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to investigate approaches for modeling individual patient count/rate data over time accounting for temporal correlation and non-constant dispersions while requiring reasonable amounts of time to search over alternative models for those data. This research addresses formulations for two approaches for extending generalized estimating equations (GEE) modeling. These approaches use a likelihood-like function based on the multivariate normal density. The first approach augments standard GEE equations to include equations for estimation of dispersion parameters. The second approach is based on estimating equations determined by partial derivatives of the likelihood-like function with respect to all model parameters and so extends linear mixed modeling. Three correlation structures are considered including independent, exchangeable, and spatial autoregressive of order 1 correlations. The likelihood-like function is used to formulate a likelihood-like cross-validation (LCV) score for use in evaluating models. Example analyses are presented using these two modeling approaches applied to three data sets of counts/rates over time for individual cancer patients including pain flares per day, as needed pain medications taken per day, and around the clock pain medications taken per day per dose. Means and dispersions are modeled as possibly nonlinear functions of time using adaptive regression modeling methods to search through alternative models compared using LCV scores. The results of these analyses demonstrate that extended linear mixed modeling is preferable for modeling individual patient count/rate data over time, because in example analyses, it either generates better LCV scores or more parsimonious models and requires substantially less time.

Indexed as

Adaptive RegressionExtended Linear Mixed ModelingGeneralized Estimating EquationsLikelihood-Like Cross-ValidationPoisson Regression

Identifiers

PMID35938069
PMCPMC9351387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.