Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35938032›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Copy Number Variation of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Detected Using NIPT in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Treated Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Mina Sharbatoghli, Fahimeh Fattahi, Hamidreza Aboulkheyr Es, Arvand Akbari, Setareh Akhavan, Marzieh Ebrahimi, Mohsen Asadi-Lari, Mehdi Totonchi, Zahra Madjd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Non-invasive prenatal testing: when results suggests maternal cancer.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mina SharbatoghliOncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Fahimeh FattahiOncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Hamidreza Aboulkheyr EsSchool of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Arvand AkbariDepartment of Genetics, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Setareh AkhavanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Marzieh EbrahimiDepartment of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Mohsen Asadi-LariOncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi TotonchiDepartment of Genetics, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra MadjdOncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRRoyan Institute · IRAcademic Center for Education, Culture and Research · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be used to characterize and monitor cancers. Recently, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a new next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based approach has been applied for detecting ctDNA. This study aimed to investigate the copy number variations (CNVs) utilizing the non-invasive prenatal testing in plasma ctDNA from ovarian cancer (OC) patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The plasma samples of six patients, including stages II-IV, were collected during the pre- and post-NAC treatment that were divided into NAC-sensitive and NAC-resistant groups during the follow-up time. CNV analysis was performed using the NIPT via two methods "an open-source algorithm WISECONDORX and NextGENe software." Results of these methods were compared in pre- and post-NAC of OC patients. Finally, bioinformatics tools were used for data mining from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to investigate CNVs in OC patients. WISECONDORX analysis indicated fewer CNV changes on chromosomes before treatment in the NAC-sensitive rather than NAC-resistant patients. NextGENe data indicated that CNVs are not only observed in the coding genes but also in non-coding genes. CNVs in six genes were identified, including HSF1, TMEM249, MROH1, GSTT2B, ABR, and NOMO2, only in NAC-resistant patients. The comparison of these six genes in NAC-resistant patients with The Cancer Genome Atlas data illustrated that the total alteration frequency is amplification, and the highest incidence of the CNVs (≥35% based on TCGA data) is found in MROH1, TMEM249, and HSF1 genes on the chromosome (Chr) 8. Based on TCGA data, survival analysis showed a significant reduction in the overall survival among chemotherapy-resistant patients as well as a high expression level of these three genes compared to that of sensitive samples (all,

Indexed as

CNVscopy number variationsctDNANIPTovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID35938032
PMCPMC9355329
OpenAlexW4286560325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.