ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
Matching Biomedical Ontologies
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping whole-organism genetic comorbidities across model Species using unified ontologies.Genetics · 2026Article
- The standard problem.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Prediction and curation of missing biomedical identifier mappings with Biomappings.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomedical ontologies have been used extensively to formally define and organize biomedical terminologies, and these ontologies are typically manually created by biomedical experts. With more biomedical ontologies being built independently, matching them to address the problem of heterogeneity and interoperability has become a critical challenge in many biomedical applications. Existing matching methods have mostly focused on capturing features of terminological, structural, and contextual semantics in ontologies. However, these feature engineering-based techniques are not only labor-intensive but also ignore the hidden semantic relations in ontologies. In this study, we propose an alternative biomedical ontology-matching framework BioHAN via a hybrid graph attention network, and that consists of three techniques. First, we propose an effective ontology-enriching method that refines and enriches the ontologies through axioms and external resources. Subsequently, we use hyperbolic graph attention layers to encode hierarchical concepts in a unified hyperbolic space. Finally, we aggregate the features of both the direct and distant neighbors with a graph attention network. Experimental results on real-world biomedical ontologies demonstrate that BioHAN is competitive with the state-of-the-art ontology matching methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.