ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
Profiling a Community-Specific Function Landscape for Bacterial Peptides Through Protein-Level Meta-Assembly and Machine Learning.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- SProtFP: a machine learning-based method for functional classification of small ORFs in prokaryotes.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Can artificial intelligence uncover the bioactive peptides' benefits for human health and knowledge? A narrative review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- A survey of experimental and computational identification of small proteins.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Small proteins, encoded by small open reading frames, are only beginning to emerge with the current advancement of omics technology and bioinformatics. There is increasing evidence that small proteins play roles in diverse critical biological functions, such as adjusting cellular metabolism, regulating other protein activities, controlling cell cycles, and affecting disease physiology. In prokaryotes such as bacteria, the small proteins are largely unexplored for their sequence space and functional groups. For most bacterial species from a natural community, the sample cannot be easily isolated or cultured, and the bacterial peptides must be better characterized in a metagenomic manner. The bacterial peptides identified from metagenomic samples can not only enrich the pool of small proteins but can also reveal the community-specific microbe ecology information from a small protein perspective. In this study, metaBP (Bacterial Peptides for metagenomic sample) has been developed as a comprehensive toolkit to explore the small protein universe from metagenomic samples. It takes raw sequencing reads as input, performs protein-level meta-assembly, and computes bacterial peptide homolog groups with sample-specific mutations. The metaBP also integrates general protein annotation tools as well as our small protein-specific machine learning module metaBP-ML to construct a full landscape for bacterial peptides. The metaBP-ML shows advantages for discovering functions of bacterial peptides in a microbial community and increases the yields of annotations by up to five folds. The metaBP toolkit demonstrates its novelty in adopting the protein-level assembly to discover small proteins, integrating protein-clustering tool in a new and flexible environment of RBiotools, and presenting the first-time small protein landscape by metaBP-ML. Taken together, metaBP (and metaBP-ML) can profile functional bacterial peptides from metagenomic samples with potential diverse mutations, in order to depict a unique landscape of small proteins from a microbial community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.