ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022
Knowledge Domains and Emerging Trends of Osteoblasts-Osteoclasts in Bone Disease From 2002 to 2021: A Bibliometrics Analysis and Visualization Study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal trends in post-cardiac arrest brain injury research: a bibliometric analysis of evolving priorities and translation gaps.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Global research on the crosstalk between microbiota - intratumoral microorganisms and liver cancer: a visualization analysis.Infectious agents and cancer · 2026Article
- Research progress of early brain Injury in subarachnoid hemorrhage from 2004 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Review
- Therapeutic hypothermia for neonates: a bibliometric analysis and visualization research.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Mapping knowledge structure and themes trends of non-surgical treatment in intervertebral disc degeneration.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Global trends in publications regarding macrophages-related diabetic foot ulcers in the last two decades.World journal of diabetes · 2024Article
- Global research trends in therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials from 2000 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Studies in Depression.Current neuropharmacology · 2024Article
- Immunological factors in cirrhosis diseases from a bibliometric point of view.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Bibliometric Analysis of Research Relating to Perineal Pain Reported over the Period 1981 to 2021.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- A Scientometric Study to a Critical Review on Promising Anticancer and Neuroprotective Compounds: Citrus Flavonoids.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Insight into the Molecule Impact of Critical-Sized UHMWPE-ALN Wear Particles on Cells by the Alginate-Encapsulated Cell Reactor.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Advances in gut microbiome in metabonomics perspective: based on bibliometrics methods and visualization analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Knowledge domains and emerging trends of microglia research from 2002 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis and visualization study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoblasts-Osteoclasts has been a major area in bone disease research for a long time. However, there are few systematic studies in this field using bibliometric analysis. We aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis and visualization study to determine hotspots and trends of osteoblasts-osteoclasts in bone diseases, identify collaboration and influence among authors, countries, institutions, and journals, and assess the knowledge base to develop basic and clinical research in the future. Methods: We collected articles and reviews for osteoblasts-osteoclasts in bone diseases from the Web of Science Core Collection. In addition, we utilized scientometrics software (CiteSpace5.8 and VOSviewer1.6.18) for visual analysis of countries/regions, institutions, authors, references, and keywords in the field. Results: In total, 16,832 authors from 579 institutions in 73 countries/regions have published 3,490 papers in 928 academic journals. The literature in this field is rapidly increasing, with Conclusion: We identified the research hotspots and development process of osteoblasts-osteoclasts in bone disease using bibliometric and visual methods. Osteoblasts-osteoclasts have attracted increasing attention in bone disease. This study will provide a valuable reference for researchers concerned with osteoblasts-osteoclasts in bone diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.