Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35937766›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of laboratory medicine2022

Implementing an intensified mentorship approach towards accelerated medical laboratory accreditation in 10 counties in Kenya.

Susan K Musau, Christina Mwachari, Elvis Kirui, Junghae Muthoni, Taylor Lascko, Natalia Blanco, Alash'le Abimiku, Emily Koech

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of laboratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Susan K MusauDepartment of Laboratory, Maryland Global Initiatives Corporation (MGIC), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4521-7230
Christina MwachariDepartment of Laboratory, Maryland Global Initiatives Corporation (MGIC), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-4079
Elvis KiruiDepartment of Strategic Information, Maryland Global Initiatives Corporation (MGIC), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4981-2697
Junghae MuthoniLaboratory Department, Centers for Disease Control, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1379-8045
Taylor LasckoCenter for International Health, Education, and Biosecurity, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-9692
Natalia BlancoCenter for International Health, Education, and Biosecurity, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3157-1119
Alash'le AbimikuSchool of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2213-0204
Emily KoechDepartment of Laboratory, Maryland Global Initiatives Corporation (MGIC), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9481-9540
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · KEDevelopment Initiatives · GBInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite Kenya's roll-out of the Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation programme in 2010, most laboratories had not made significant or tangible improvements towards accreditation by 2016. In April 2016, the University of Maryland, Baltimore enrolled 27 facilities in the standard Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation programme. Objective: This study aimed to describe and evaluate the implementation of an intensified mentorship strategy on laboratory accreditation. Methods: In October 2017, the University of Maryland, Baltimore implemented intensive mentorship in 27 hospital laboratories in Nairobi, Kiambu, Meru, Embu, Muranga, Nyeri, Laikipia, Nyandarua, Tharaka-Nithi, and Kirinyaga counties in Kenya. Laboratories were paired with competent mentors whose skills were matched to facility gaps. Baseline and follow-up assessments were done between April 2016 and March 2019 using the World Health Organization's Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation Checklist and overall scores of the 12 Quality System Essentials and star ratings (from zero to five, based on scores) used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intensified mentorship. Results: In September 2017, 14 laboratories scored zero stars, three scored one star, eight scored two stars, one scored three stars, and one laboratory was accredited. By March 2019, eight laboratories were accredited, five scored four stars, 10 scored three stars, three scored two stars, and only one scored one star. The average score change with the intensified approach was 81.5 versus 53.9 for the standard approach. Conclusion: The intensified mentorship strategy resulted in fast-tracked progress towards laboratory accreditation and can be adopted in similar resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

accreditationintensified mentorshipKenyaQMSSLIPTASLMTA

Identifiers

PMID35937766
PMCPMC9350484
OpenAlexW4283767081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.