Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35937666›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2022

Durability of current generation flexible ureteroscopes: the experience from a high-volume centre.

Chandra Mohan Vaddi, Paidakula Ramakrishna, Soundarya Ganesan, Siddalinga Swamy, Hemnath Anandan, Manas Babu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chandra Mohan VaddiPreeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Paidakula RamakrishnaPreeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Soundarya GanesanPreeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Siddalinga SwamyPreeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Hemnath AnandanPreeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Manas BabuPreeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Gujarat Kidney Foundation · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this article was to evaluate the durability of current generation fibreoptic flexible ureteroscopes (FURS), analyse factors that influence durability, identify reasons for premature damage of FURS and offer suggestions to expand its life span. Material and methods: A total of 952 retrograde intrarenal surgeries (RIRS) done for upper tract calculi using 8 fibreoptic FURS, namely three Storz Flex X2, one Flex X2S, two Olympus URF- P6, two Olympus URF- P7, between March 2013 and December 2018, were reviewed retrospectively. All procedures were done by two consultants, in a single referral centre. Data relating to stone characteristics and flexible ureteroscopy procedure were retrieved from hospital database. The primary end point was damage of FURS requiring first repair. Results: The average stone burden was 14.59 ±3.37 mm (range 3-22 mm). Ureteral access sheath was used in 95.4% of cases, 36.7% of the cases were pre-stented. Mean ureteroscope durability was 119 procedures and mean ureteroscopy time was 71.99 hours of use before first repair. Prolonged laser usage time and increased usage of accessories had significant negative impact on longevity of FURS (p = 0.002, p = 0.036 respectively). Inadvertent laser fibre misfire and extreme torque caused premature FURS damage, at the end of 35 and 12 procedures respectively. Conclusions: Current generation fibreoptic flexible ureteroscopes have a mean durability of 119 procedures. Anticipation of torque, knowledge of the common reasons for damage and meticulous handling is essential to maximise the durability of FURS.

Indexed as

durabilityfibreopticflexible ureteroscopepremature damagereusable

Identifiers

PMID35937666
PMCPMC9326697
OpenAlexW4285256710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.