Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35937639›Full record

ArticleBiology methods & protocols2022

An efficient procedure for the recovery of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections.

Utako Oba, Kenichi Kohashi, Yuhei Sangatsuda, Yoshinao Oda, Koh-Hei Sonoda, Shouichi Ohga, Koji Yoshimoto, Yasuhito Arai, Shinichi Yachida, Tatsuhiro Shibata and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. BRAFVeterinary research communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Comprehensive Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Colorectal Cancer Archaeome: A Metagenomic Exploration, Tunisia.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Utako ObaDepartment of Biochemistry, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Kenichi KohashiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Yuhei SangatsudaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Yoshinao OdaDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Koh-Hei SonodaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Shouichi OhgaDepartment of Pediatrics, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Koji YoshimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Yasuhito AraiDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Shinichi YachidaDepartment of Cancer Genome Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Tatsuhiro ShibataDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Takashi ItoDepartment of Biochemistry, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Fumihito MiuraDepartment of Biochemistry, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2656-486X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of new molecular diagnostic techniques, retrieving DNA from the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues has become an essential yet challenging step for efficient downstream processes. Owing to low quality and quantity of DNA retrieved from the FFPE sections, the process is often impractical and needs significant improvements. Here, we established an efficient method for the purification of DNA from FFPE specimens by optimizing incubation temperature, incubation time, and the concentration of a formalin scavenger tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) for reverse-crosslinking. The optimized method, named "Highly concentrated Tris-mediated DNA extraction" (HiTE), yielded three times the DNA yield per tissue slice compared with a representative DNA extraction kit. Moreover, the use of HiTE-extracted DNA increased the yield of the sequencing library three times and accordingly yielded a log higher and more reproducible sequencing library compared with that obtained using the commonly used commercial kit. The sequencing library prepared from HiTE-extracted FFPE-DNA had longer inserts and produced reads that evenly covered the reference genome. Successful application of HiTE-extracted FFPE-DNA for whole-genome and targeted gene panel sequencing indicates its practical usability.

Indexed as

clinical sequencingDNA extraction methodformalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissuesnext-generation sequencer

Identifiers

PMID35937639
PMCPMC9351614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.