ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2022
Exploring the association between outcome measures to guide clinical management in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] The usefulness and limitations of outcome measures changes throughout functional decline of patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). This study aims to describe associations between outcome measures in patients with ALS over time. [Participants and Methods] Participant data was collected at a multidisciplinary ALS clinic during regular clinic visits, including gait velocity, Timed Up and Go, the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, and it's Gross Motor Subscale. [Results] All gait velocity measures were <1.2 m/sec; average Timed Up and Go was >13.5 sec. There was strong internal consistency between ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised and its functional mobility components and a strong, significant correlation between the Timed Up and Go and the Gross Motor Subscale. [Conclusion] Patients with ALS are not community ambulators and demonstrate risk for falls. We found concurrent validity between objective and self-reported measures. The strong association between the Gross Motor Subscale and the Timed Up and Go may allow PTs to utilize the self-reported Gross Motor Subscale to predict fall risk. Clinically, when the Timed Up and Go and gait velocity are no longer appropriate due to disease progression, the Gross Motor Subscale can provide insight into functional decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.