Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35937566›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2022

Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Besylate versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in Non-Intubated Older Patients with Agitated Delirium After Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Yang Deng, Zhijun Qin, Qianyun Wu, Linsong Liu, Xi Yang, Xuan Ju, Ying Zhang, Lei Liu

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. What Every Intensivist Should Know About Remimazolam.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yang DengIntensive Care Unit, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8364-1046
Zhijun QinIntensive Care Unit, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-090X
Qianyun WuNursing Department, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Linsong LiuIntensive Care Unit, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Xi YangIntensive Care Unit, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Xuan JuIntensive Care Unit, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Ying ZhangIntensive Care Unit, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Lei LiuDepartment of Infection Control, Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Sichuan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate compared with dexmedetomidine for the relief of agitated delirium in non-intubated older patients after orthopedic surgery. Patients and methods: Seventy-five patients were randomly divided into two groups. Patients assigned to the remimazolam group received a loading dose of 0.075 mg/kg remimazolam besylate over 1 minute, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg/h. Subjects randomized to the dexmedetomidine group received a loading infusion of 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine over 10 minutes, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.2 to 0.7 μg/kg/h. Meanwhile, RASS score-guided dose titration was followed. To assess the efficacy of the study drugs in terms of time to resolution of agitation, time to first achievement of target sedation, percentage of time within the target sedation range, and time to delirium resolution. Safety of the sedatives was evaluated by adverse events during hospitalization. Results: Time to resolution of agitation did not differ between the two groups. The time to first achievement of target sedation was 19.0 (9.5 to 31.0) minutes for remimazolam besylate vs 43.5 (15.0 to 142.5) minutes for dexmedetomidine ( Conclusion: Compared with dexmedetomidine, remimazolam besylate was equally effective in relieving agitation, and resulted in earlier achievement of sedation goal and more controllable sedation. Remimazolam may be an ideal agent for obtaining rapid tranquillisation.

Indexed as

DeliriumDexmedetomidineOrthopedic ProceduresBenzodiazepinesHumansHypnotics and SedativesBenzodiazepinesDexmedetomidineHypnotics and Sedativesremimazolamagitationdeliriumdexmedetomidineolder adultorthopedicsremimazolam besylate

Identifiers

PMID35937566
PMCPMC9354763
OpenAlexW4289337926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.