Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35937555›Full record

ArticlePerspectives of the ASHA special interest groups2020

Automatic Estimation of Laryngeal Vestibule Closure Duration Using High- Resolution Cervical Auscultation Signals.

Aliaa Sabry, Amanda S Mahoney, Shitong Mao, Yassin Khalifa, Ervin Sejdić, James L Coyle

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06637774 (The Aspirometer), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06637774 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Aspirometer: A Noninvasive Tool for Detecting Aspiration

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2022 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsDeglutition DisordersArmsAspirometer, Videofluoroscopic X-ray
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aliaa SabryDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
Amanda S MahoneyDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
Shitong MaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
Yassin KhalifaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
Ervin SejdićDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
James L CoyleDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

The Aspirometer: A noninvasive tool to detect swallowing safety and efficiencyR01HD074819 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COYLE, JAMES L, SEJDIC, ERVIN · 2013 to 2022
$3.0M
Instrumental screening for dysphagia by combining high-resolution cervical auscultation with advanced data analysis tools to identify silent dysphagia and silent aspirationR01HD092239 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COYLE, JAMES L · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074819NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Safe swallowing requires adequate protection of the airway to prevent swallowed materials from entering the trachea or lungs (i.e., aspiration). Laryngeal vestibule closure (LVC) is the first line of defense against swallowed materials entering the airway. Absent LVC or mistimed/ shortened closure duration can lead to aspiration, adverse medical consequences, and even death. LVC mechanisms can be judged commonly through the videofluoroscopic swallowing study; however, this type of instrumentation exposes patients to radiation and is not available or acceptable to all patients. There is growing interest in noninvasive methods to assess/monitor swallow physiology. In this study, we hypothesized that our noninvasive sensor- based system, which has been shown to accurately track hyoid displacement and upper esophageal sphincter opening duration during swallowing, could predict laryngeal vestibule status, including the onset of LVC and the onset of laryngeal vestibule reopening, in real time and estimate the closure duration with a comparable degree of accuracy as trained human raters. Method: The sensor-based system used in this study is high-resolution cervical auscultation (HRCA). Advanced machine learning techniques enable HRCA signal analysis through feature extraction and complex algorithms. A deep learning model was developed with a data set of 588 swallows from 120 patients with suspected dysphagia and further tested on 45 swallows from 16 healthy participants. Results: The new technique achieved an overall mean accuracy of 74.90% and 75.48% for the two data sets, respectively, in distinguishing LVC status. Closure duration ratios between automated and gold-standard human judgment of LVC duration were 1.13 for the patient data set and 0.93 for the healthy participant data set. Conclusions: This study found that HRCA signal analysis using advanced machine learning techniques can effectively predict laryngeal vestibule status (closure or opening) and further estimate LVC duration. HRCA is potentially a noninvasive tool to estimate LVC duration for diagnostic and biofeedback purposes without X-ray imaging.

Identifiers

PMID35937555
PMCPMC9355454
OpenAlexW3111108096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.