Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35937461›Full record

ReviewNature aging2021

Rethinking the urban physical environment for century-long lives: from age-friendly to longevity-ready cities.

Chenghao Wang, Diego Sierra Huertas, John W Rowe, Ruth Finkelstein, Laura L Carstensen, Robert B Jackson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chenghao WangDepartment of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8846-4130
Diego Sierra HuertasStanford Center on Longevity, Stanford, CA, USA.
John W RoweMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3620-6612
Ruth FinkelsteinBrookdale Center for Healthy Aging, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Laura L CarstensenStanford Center on Longevity, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5011-3789
Robert B JacksonDepartment of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Socioemotional Functioning in Adulthood and Old AgeR37AG008816 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CARSTENSEN, LAURA L · 2005 to 2024
$11.7M
NIA NIH HHS R37 AG008816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to increasing life expectancies and urbanization, initiatives for age-friendly cities seek to facilitate active and healthy aging by strengthening supports and services for older people. While laudable, these efforts typically neglect early-life exposures that influence long-term well-being. With a focus on the urban physical environment, we argue that longevity-ready cities can accomplish more than initiatives focused solely on old age. We review features of cities that cumulatively influence healthy aging and longevity, discuss the need for proactive interventions in a changing climate, and highlight inequities in the ambient physical environment, especially those encountered at early ages, that powerfully contribute to disparities in later life stages. Compared with strategies aimed largely at accommodating older populations, longevity-ready cities would aim to reduce the sources of disadvantages across the life course and simultaneously improve the well-being of older people.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentCitiesLongevityAgedHealthy AgingHumansUrbanization

Identifiers

PMID35937461
PMCPMC9355489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.