Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35937454›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2022

Pathways to fatherhood: evaluating the priorities of self-identified gay and bisexual men pursuing family building options.

Brent M Hanson, Mark P Leondires, Haley N Glatthorn, Daniel J Kaser, James M Hotaling, Philip J Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Brent M HansonIVI-Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
Mark P LeondiresReproductive Medicine Associates of Connecticut, Norwalk, Connecticut.
Haley N GlatthornRutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Daniel J KaserIVI-Reproductive Medicine Associates of Northern California, San Francisco, California.
James M HotalingIVI-Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
Philip J ChengIVI-Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey · USReproductive Medicine Associates of New York · USRobert Wood Johnson University Hospital · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the priorities and decisions of gay and bisexual men pursuing fatherhood. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Internet-based survey. Patients: Gay and bisexual men who were interested in pursuing or had previously pursued family building options. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: This study aimed to assess the attitudes of respondents regarding the following: mode of achieving parenthood and the relative importance of a genetic link to offspring; the relative importance of factors considered when selecting an oocyte donor (OD); and the relative importance of factors associated with selecting a gestational carrier (GC). Access to care and financial considerations were also analyzed. Results: Of the 110 respondents, most (68.2%) desired parenthood via an OD and GC. This was consistent with 53.2% of respondents reporting that a genetic link to a child was "extremely important" or "important." Most couples (86.6%) desired to use sperm from both partners. In addition, 40.5% of respondents reported that a twin gestation would be the most ideal pregnancy outcome. Medical history was considered the most important factor when selecting an OD (83.5%), whereas pregnancy history was considered the most important selection criterion for a GC (86.2%). Furthermore, 89.1% of respondents reported that the fertility services they desired were available to them, although 33.0% reported they would have to travel to another state for care. Conclusions: Understanding the circumstances of gay and bisexual men pursuing fatherhood allows for individualized care. Since several respondents desired twin pregnancies, it is important to counsel patients regarding the risks of multiple gestation and determine the motivations for this preference.

Indexed as

Access to careassisted reproductive technologygayLGBTthird-party reproduction

Identifiers

PMID35937454
PMCPMC9349239
OpenAlexW3207276719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.