Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35937302›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Self-Reported Clinical Practice of Small Animal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Compliance With RECOVER Guidelines Among Veterinarians in Eight Western European Regions.

Simon P Hagley, Anne Kruppert, Rodolfo Oliveira Leal, José Carlos Pizarro Del Valle, Claudia Iannucci, Imke Hennink, Ludivine Boiron, Sabrina N Hoehne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simon P HagleyEmergency and Critical Care Department, Vets Now Referrals, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Anne KruppertDivision of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Rodolfo Oliveira LealCIISA Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS).
José Carlos Pizarro Del Valle, Small Animal Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Claudia IannucciDivision of Small Animal Emergency and Critical Care, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Imke HenninkDivision of Small Animal Emergency and Critical Care, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ludivine BoironDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Clinique Vétérinaire Languedocia, Montpellier, France.
Sabrina N HoehneDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess whether small animal veterinarians across Western Europe are compliant with the 2012 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines by the Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER). Methods: A previously published online questionnaire from Switzerland was adapted and translated into 7 languages, corresponding to national languages in Austria, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and the United Kingdom. The survey was distributed via respective national veterinary organizations and social media outlets. A subset of questions was analyzed to evaluate respondent demographics, RECOVER guideline awareness, and to allocate composite compliance scores for CPR preparedness, basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS). Percentages of group total (95% confidence interval) were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effects of region of practice, gender, age, specialty training, and guideline awareness on compliance. Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) were generated and significance set at Results: Nine-hundred and thirty respondents were included in analysis. Awareness of and compliance with RECOVER guidelines varied widely across regions. Compliance with all assessed RECOVER guideline recommendations was highest in Germany/Austria [14% (7- 27%)] and lowest in France and Portugal [0% (0-3%)]. CPR preparedness compliance was higher in participants aware of RECOVER guidelines [OR 10.1 (5.2-19.5)], those practicing in Germany/Austria [OR 4.1 (1.9-8.8)] or UK/Ireland [OR 2.2 (1.3-3.7)], and lower in those practicing in Portugal [OR 0.2 (0.1-0.9)]. Specialty training [OR 1.8 (1.1-2.9)], guideline awareness [OR 5.2 (3.2-8.6)], and practice in Germany/Austria [OR 3.1 (1.5-6.5)], UK/Ireland [OR 2.6 (1.7-4.1)], or the Netherlands [OR 5.3 (2.0-14.2)] were associated with increased BLS compliance. ALS compliance was higher in participants with guideline awareness [OR 7.0 (2.9-17.0)], specialty training [OR 6.8 (3.8-12.1)], those practicing in Germany/Austria [OR 3.5 (1.3-9.6)], UK/Ireland [OR 4.0 (1.9-8.3)], or Spain [OR 3.2 (1.2-8.3)] and in younger survey participants [OR 0.9 (0.9-1.0)]. Conclusions: Awareness and compliance with RECOVER guidelines varied widely among countries surveyed, however overall compliance scores in all countries were considered low. Further research may highlight factors surrounding poor guideline awareness and compliance so targeted efforts can be made to improve veterinary CPR in Europe.

Indexed as

cardiopulmonary resuscitationcomplianceEuropeguidelinesRECOVER

Identifiers

PMID35937302
PMCPMC9352391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.