Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35937293›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Thoracic Electrical Impedance Tomography-The 2022 Veterinary Consensus Statement.

Olivia A Brabant, David P Byrne, Muriel Sacks, Fernando Moreno Martinez, Anthea L Raisis, Joaquin B Araos, Andreas D Waldmann, Johannes P Schramel, Aline Ambrosio, Giselle Hosgood and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Olivia A BrabantSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
David P ByrneSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Muriel SacksSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Fernando Moreno MartinezSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Anthea L RaisisSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Joaquin B AraosDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Andreas D WaldmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Johannes P SchramelDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Aline AmbrosioDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Giselle HosgoodSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Christina BraunDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ulrike AuerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ulrike BleulClinic of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Farm Animals, Vetsuisse-Faculty University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicolas HertemanClinic for Equine Internal Medicine, Equine Hospital, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Cristy J SecombeSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Angelika SchosterClinic for Equine Internal Medicine, Equine Hospital, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Joao SoaresDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Shannon BeazleyDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College Veterinary Medicine, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Carolina MeiraDepartment of Clinical Diagnostics and Services, Anaesthesiology, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andy AdlerDepartment of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Martina MosingSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Murdoch University · AUUniversity of Zurich · CHUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATCarleton University · CACornell University · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive real-time non-ionising imaging modality that has many applications. Since the first recorded use in 1978, the technology has become more widely used especially in human adult and neonatal critical care monitoring. Recently, there has been an increase in research on thoracic EIT in veterinary medicine. Real-time imaging of the thorax allows evaluation of ventilation distribution in anesthetised and conscious animals. As the technology becomes recognised in the veterinary community there is a need to standardize approaches to data collection, analysis, interpretation and nomenclature, ensuring comparison and repeatability between researchers and studies. A group of nineteen veterinarians and two biomedical engineers experienced in veterinary EIT were consulted and contributed to the preparation of this statement. The aim of this consensus is to provide an introduction to this imaging modality, to highlight clinical relevance and to include recommendations on how to effectively use thoracic EIT in veterinary species. Based on this, the consensus statement aims to address the need for a streamlined approach to veterinary thoracic EIT and includes: an introduction to the use of EIT in veterinary species, the technical background to creation of the functional images, a consensus from all contributing authors on the practical application and use of the technology, descriptions and interpretation of current available variables including appropriate statistical analysis, nomenclature recommended for consistency and future developments in thoracic EIT. The information provided in this consensus statement may benefit researchers and clinicians working within the field of veterinary thoracic EIT. We endeavor to inform future users of the benefits of this imaging modality and provide opportunities to further explore applications of this technology with regards to perfusion imaging and pathology diagnosis.

Indexed as

animalschestconsensuselectrical impedance tomographyimaging

Identifiers

PMID35937293
PMCPMC9354895
OpenAlexW4286561520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.