ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2022
Teachers' use of assistive technology in Saudi special education schools: A mixed-methods enquiry.
Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Teachers' experiences of remote teaching in the COVID-19 pandemic for students with intellectual disabilities in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to examine assistive technology (AT) use, elements teachers take into consideration when selecting AT, and barriers from the standpoint of teachers of students with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. To answer the research questions, the researcher employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. A self-administered online survey and interviews were conducted to collect data. A total of 92 special education teachers from four special education institutes were surveyed, and five teachers were interviewed to provide interpretations for the analysed quantitative data. Results demonstrated there were cultural factors that could influence AT use with students. Findings revealed there was a lack of AT use, with teachers reporting higher use of low-tech than mid-tech and high-tech. The most reported barriers were lack of AT devices and lack of training. The results also revealed there were statistical differences in AT use between the four special education institutes and between teachers with previous AT training. Four major themes and several sub-themes emerged from the interviews. The themes were (a) AT use, (b) considerations, (c) barriers, and (d) professional development. These themes made it possible to interpret and elaborate on the quantitative data. The findings suggest the necessity of professional development for teachers, an increase in financial support, and provision of appropriate curriculum for successfully using AT in classrooms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.