Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35937076›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of nanomedicine2022

Update on the Use of PET/MRI Contrast Agents and Tracers in Brain Oncology: A Systematic Review.

Alessio Smeraldo, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione, Andrea Soricelli, Paolo Antonio Netti, Enza Torino

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of nanomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Multiparametric simultaneous hybridQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Application of Metabolic Reprogramming to Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessio Smeraldo *Department of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, 80125, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7256-134X
Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione *Department of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, 80125, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1346-515X
Andrea SoricelliDepartment of Motor Sciences and Healthiness, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, 80133, Italy.
Paolo Antonio NettiDepartment of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, 80125, Italy.
Enza TorinoDepartment of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, 80125, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8905-1925
Italian Institute of Technology · ITParthenope University of Naples · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent advancements in hybrid positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging systems (PET/MRI) have brought massive value in the investigation of disease processes, in the development of novel treatments, in the monitoring of both therapy response and disease progression, and, not least, in the introduction of new multidisciplinary molecular imaging approaches. While offering potential advantages over PET/CT, the hybrid PET/MRI proved to improve both the image quality and lesion detectability. In particular, it showed to be an effective tool for the study of metabolic information about lesions and pathological conditions affecting the brain, from a better tumor characterization to the analysis of metabolic brain networks. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, this work presents a systematic review on PET/MRI in basic research and clinical differential diagnosis on brain oncology and neurodegenerative disorders. The analysis includes literature works and clinical case studies, with a specific focus on the use of PET tracers and MRI contrast agents, which are usually employed to perform hybrid PET/MRI studies of brain tumors. A systematic literature search for original diagnostic studies is performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science. Patients, study, and imaging characteristics were extracted from the selected articles. The analysis included acquired data pooling, heterogeneity testing, sensitivity analyses, used tracers, and reported patient outcomes. Our analysis shows that, while PET/MRI for the brain is a promising diagnostic method for early diagnosis, staging and recurrence in patients with brain diseases, a better definition of the role of tracers and imaging agents in both clinical and preclinical hybrid PET/MRI applications is needed and further efforts should be devoted to the standardization of the contrast imaging protocols, also considering the emerging agents and multimodal probes.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyBrainContrast MediaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingContrast Mediabrain oncologycontrast agentsmedical imagingPET/MRIradiotracers

Identifiers

PMID35937076
PMCPMC9346926
OpenAlexW4288734714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.