ArticleUltrasound (Leeds, England)2022
Placental elastography in second trimester preeclampsia prediction: A prospective study.
Article in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- 2D Shear Wave Elastography: An Evolving Technique for Comparison of Placental Elasticity in Normal and Preeclamptic Pregnancy.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- The Relationship between Placental Shear Wave Elastography and Fetal Weight-A Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Value of Ultrasonic Elastography in Detecting Placental Stiffness for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia: A Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of placental shear wave elastography in predicting preeclampsia at 16 to 20 weeks of gestation. Materials and methods: A total of 230 pregnant women between 16 and 20 weeks of gestation were observed for the study. These women underwent shear wave elastography ElastPQ (Philips Healthcare, Bothell, Washington, USA) of the placenta. The mean value of placental shear modulus was obtained for each participant. These participants were followed up for the development of preeclampsia and were divided into two groups; group A included those who developed preeclampsia and group B included those who remained normotensive until delivery. The elasticity values of the two groups were compared, and the ROC curve was drawn to obtain the best cut-off value that would predict the onset of preeclampsia. Results: Placental shear modulus varied from 1.03 kPa to 7.4 kPa at 16 to 20 weeks of gestation with an average of 2.74 ± 0.87 kPa. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean value of elasticity between two groups, being 4.61 kPa in group A and 2.51 kPa in group B. Maximum diagnostic accuracy was obtained at 2.9667 kPa with area under the curve 0.970, sensitivity 92%, specificity 91.71%, positive predictive value 57.5% and negative predictive value 98.9%. Conclusion: Stiffness of placenta, quantitatively measured by SWE at 16 to 20 weeks of gestation, is higher in the women who develop preeclampsia and hence may be used for predicting preeclampsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.