Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35936962›Full record

ReviewUltrasound (Leeds, England)2022

Usefulness of ultrasound fusion technology for hepatocellular carcinoma localisation, pre- and post-thermal ablation.

A Mohamed Afif, O D Laroco, Smd Lau, S M Teo, As Abdul Rahman, C W Too, N Venkatanarasimha, A Gogna

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Mohamed AfifDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6631-174X
O D LarocoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Smd LauDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
S M TeoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
As Abdul RahmanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
C W TooDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
N VenkatanarasimhaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
A GognaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Singapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous thermal ablation of inconspicuous lesions can be challenging. Fusion ultrasound (FUS) allows the use of previously performed diagnostic imaging like computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET-CT) to localise hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for treatment. This paper illustrates FUS case studies of pre-, intra- and post-ablation imaging of inconspicuous HCC, supplemented by use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Method: Four prospective cases during September 2014 to October 2018, with HCC amenable to ablation, which were poorly identified on ultrasound, underwent FUS. FUS pre-screening was scheduled within three months of the previous CT or MRI, and between one to four weeks prior to the scheduled ablation date. Post-ablation imaging with FUS was performed between four to six weeks to coincide with their routine follow-up CT or MRI. Findings: There were potential benefits observed in the cases with combined techniques of FUS and CEUS for limiting circumstances such as heat sink effect, multiple lesions targeting, inconspicuous lesion detection and pre-ablation technical feasibility assessment. Discussion: The combined use of FUS and CEUS improves tumour visibility, increases operator imaging confidence and reduces heat sink effect during percutaneous thermal ablation. Conclusion: FUS imaging is helpful in targeting poor conspicuity lesions that cannot be detected on grey-scale ultrasound. It facilitates in ensuring optimal treatment of hepatic lesions for improvement of patient prognosis and follow-up imaging.

Indexed as

contrastfusionhepatocellular carcinomasonographyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID35936962
PMCPMC9354184
OpenAlexW3211217291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.