Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35936860›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy techniques2022

Bubble Sign: An Arthroscopic Technical Trick to Differentiate Between Partial- and Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears.

Drashti Upadhyay, Michael Scheidt, Nickolas Garbis, Dane Salazar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy techniques, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Drashti UpadhyayLoyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Orland Park.
Michael ScheidtDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood.
Nickolas GarbisDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rehabilitation, Loyola University Hospital System, Maywood, Illinois, U.S.A.
Dane SalazarDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rehabilitation, Loyola University Hospital System, Maywood, Illinois, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinguishing between partial-thickness and small focal full-thickness tears of rotator cuff may be important for determining the appropriate surgical treatment options and repair constructs in the care of patients with rotator cuff pathology. This article presents a simple intraoperative technical trick to aid in identification of small full-thickness tears of the superior rotator cuff. The relatively higher-pressured subacromial space and the low-pressured glenohumeral joint are separated by the supraspinatus tendon. When this barrier is compromised due to a full-thickness tear, free fluid flows from high to low pressure down the native pressure gradient. This is seen as the movement of air bubbles into the glenohumeral joint from the subacromial space and can be used to identify the presence of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear on diagnostic arthroscopy.

Identifiers

PMID35936860
PMCPMC9353585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.