Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35936760›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on services computing2022

A Generic Deep Learning Based Cough Analysis System From Clinically Validated Samples for Point-of-Need Covid-19 Test and Severity Levels.

Javier Andreu-Perez, Humberto Perez-Espinosa, Eva Timonet, Mehrin Kiani, Manuel I Giron-Perez, Alma B Benitez-Trinidad, Delaram Jarchi, Alejandro Rosales-Perez, Nick Gatzoulis, Orion F Reyes-Galaviz and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on services computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A summary of the ComParE COVID-19 challenges.Frontiers in digital health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Javier Andreu-PerezSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and HealthUniversity of Essex Colchester CO4 3SQ U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7421-4808
Humberto Perez-EspinosaSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and HealthUniversity of Essex Colchester CO4 3SQ U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2331-1800
Eva TimonetAgencia Sanitaria Costa del SolJunta de Andalucia Consejeria de Salud 41020 Seville Spain.
Mehrin KianiSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and HealthUniversity of Essex Colchester CO4 3SQ U.K.
Manuel I Giron-PerezAutonomous University of Nayarit Tepic 63155 Mexico.
Alma B Benitez-TrinidadAutonomous University of Nayarit Tepic 63155 Mexico.
Delaram JarchiSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and HealthUniversity of Essex Colchester CO4 3SQ U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6699-8721
Alejandro Rosales-PerezCentro de Investigación en Matemáticas, A.C. (CIMAT) Guanajuato 36023 Mexico.
Nick GatzoulisSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and HealthUniversity of Essex Colchester CO4 3SQ U.K.
Orion F Reyes-GalavizINAOE Puebla 72840 Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0484-2163
Alejandro Torres-GarciaINAOE Puebla 72840 Mexico.
Carlos A Reyes-GarciaINAOE Puebla 72840 Mexico.
Zulfiqar AliSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and HealthUniversity of Essex Colchester CO4 3SQ U.K.
Francisco RivasAgencia Sanitaria Costa del SolJunta de Andalucia Consejeria de Salud 41020 Seville Spain.
University of Essex · GBNational Institute of Astrophysics, Optics and Electronics · MXAgencia Sanitaria Costa del Sol · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Nayarit · MXMathematics Research Center · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an attempt to reduce the infection rate of the COrona VIrus Disease-19 (Covid-19) countries around the world have echoed the exigency for an economical, accessible, point-of-need diagnostic test to identify Covid-19 carriers so that they (individuals who test positive) can be advised to self isolate rather than the entire community. Availability of a quick turn-around time diagnostic test would essentially mean that life, in general, can return to normality-at-large. In this regards, studies concurrent in time with ours have investigated different respiratory sounds, including cough, to recognise potential Covid-19 carriers. However, these studies lack clinical control and rely on Internet users confirming their test results in a web questionnaire (crowdsourcing) thus rendering their analysis inadequate. We seek to evaluate the detection performance of a primary screening tool of Covid-19 solely based on the cough sound from

Indexed as

audio systemsDeep Learningsmart healthcare

Identifiers

PMID35936760
PMCPMC9328729
OpenAlexW3132012119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.