ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022
Availability and Affordability of Oncology Drugs in 2012-2021 in China and the United States.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The clinical trial landscape of bispecific antibodies in non-small cell lung cancer: mechanistic trends and developmental strategies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- In reply.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Disease burden of hematological malignancies worldwide, in China and in the United States based on the GLOBOCAN 2022 and Global Burden of Disease 2021 data.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Characteristics, accessibility and regional equity evaluation of pediatric medicines through National Drug Price Negotiation of China, 2017-2024.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Global disparities in access to diagnostics and therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: from discovery to delivery - a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Advances in Gene Therapy with Oncolytic Viruses and CAR-T Cells and Therapy-Related Groups.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Regulatory flexibilities balancing unmet needs, benefits and risks in the approvals of imported cancer drugs in China: a cohort study from 2012 to 2021.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Disparities in availability of new cancer drugs worldwide: 1990-2022.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Cancer drug indication approvals in China and the United States: a comparison of approval times and clinical benefit, 2001-2020.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Growing research and development of targeted anticancer drugs in China.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2023Article
- Global trends in the health economics field of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: A bibliometric and visualized study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Improving access to medicines: lessons from 10 years of drug reforms in China, 2009-2020.BMJ global health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically summarize the landscape and characteristics of all approved new anticancer drugs for the last 10 years in China and the United States (US) to further inform the trend, current state, and existing gap in the availability and affordability of cancer medicine between the two countries. Methods: Mainly based on the Pharmcube database, a list and detailed information of anticancer drugs approved in China and the United States were acquired. The annual number, time lag, and basic characteristics, including drug type, mechanism, enterprise type, indication population, drug target, and cancer type of approved drugs were compared. Results: Eighty-seven and 118 new anticancer drugs were approved in China and the US, respectively, showing a stable trend in the US, while a significant increase was observed after 2016 in China. Of the 42 cancer medicines launched in both countries, the US took precedence, and the median time lag markedly decreased, from 6.53 years in 2012 to 0.88 years in 2020. A total of 14.4% of drugs were applicable to children in the US, while only 2.3% were applicable in China, and there was no difference in drug type and enterprise. Thirty-one and 43 targets were explored, with respect to 27 and 36 cancer types in China and the US, respectively, during the period. In addition, the expenditure of drugs on PD-1 and PD-L1 in China was generally lower than that in America. Conclusion: The availability of new anticancer drugs has increased dramatically in the past decade, particularly in China. Compared with the US, the launch of new anticancer drugs in China lags behind, but the time lag has been shortened significantly, and better affordability is observed in immune drugs. More attention should be given to differentiated innovation, and unmet medical needs in special populations like childhood tumors, which are important directions of new drug R&D in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.