ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Commencing colorectal cancer screening at age 45 years in U.S. racial groups.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rethinking Colorectal Cancer Screening: Culturally Tailored Navigation for Mailed FIT Kits in 45- to 49-Year-Olds.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Unmet social needs and colorectal cancer testing at 45-49 since the 2021 USPSTF recommendation.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Early and late-onset colorectal cancer in African Americans during COVID-19.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Stool shed cell transcriptomics mirrors tumor biology and enables colorectal cancer diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cancer Screening Progress and Noninvasive Screening Opportunities since the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Rising Incidence and Mortality of Colorectal Cancer in Young African Adults: Need for a Better Care Plan.Cureus · 2025Review
- Trends and Symptoms Among Increasing Proportion of African Americans with Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer over a 60-Year Period.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Contributions to Colorectal Cancer Disparities.JAMA oncology · 2024Article
- Trends in mortality from gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pancreatic cancers in the United States: A comprehensive analysis (1999-2020).JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Article
- Improving Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.The New England journal of medicine · 2024Article
- THE JEREMIAH METZGER LECTURE: ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON COLORECTAL CANCER.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is cost-effective for reducing its mortality among the average-risk population. In the US, CRC incidence and mortality differ among racial/ethnic groups, with non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) and American Indian/Alaska Natives showing highest incidence and mortality and earlier presentation. Since 2005, some professional societies have recommended CRC screening for NHB to commence at 45 years or earlier; this was not implemented due to lack of recommendation from key groups that influence insurance payment coverage. In 2017 the highly influential U.S. Multi-Society Task Force for Colorectal Cancer recommended screening to commence at 45 years for NHB; this recommendation was supplanted by data showing an increase in early-onset CRCs in non-Hispanic Whites approaching the under-50-year rates observed for NHB. Subsequently the American Cancer Society and the USPSTF recommended that the entire average-risk population move to commence CRC screening at 45 years. Implementing screening in 45-49-year-olds has its challenges as younger groups compared with older groups participate less in preventive care. The US had made extensive progress pre-COVID-19 in closing the disparity gap for CRC screening in NHB above age 50 years; implementing screening at younger ages will take ingenuity, foresight, and creative strategy to reach a broader-aged population while preventing widening the screening disparity gap. Approaches such as navigation for non-invasive and minimally invasive CRC screening tests, removal of financial barriers such as co-pays, and complete follow up to abnormal non-invasive screening tests will need to become the norm for broad implementation and success across all racial/ethnic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.