Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35936691›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Comparison of the Differential Diagnostic Performance of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Malignant and Benign Thyroid Nodules.

Liling Jiang, Jiao Chen, Haiping Huang, Jian Wu, Junbin Zhang, Xiaosong Lan, Daihong Liu, Jiuquan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liling JiangDepartment of Radiology, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Jiao ChenDepartment of Radiology, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Haiping HuangDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Jian WuHead and Neck Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Junbin ZhangHead and Neck Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaosong LanDepartment of Radiology, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Daihong LiuDepartment of Radiology, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Jiuquan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic capacity between IVIM and DKI in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules. Material and Methods: This study is based on magnetic resonance imaging data of the thyroid with histopathology as the reference standard. Spearman analysis was used to assess the relationship of IVIM-derived parameters D, f, D* and the DKI-derived parameters D Results: Among the 93 nodules, 46 nodules were malignant, and 47 nodules were benign. The D Conclusions: IVIM and DKI were alternative for each other in in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.

Indexed as

diffusion kurtosis imagingintravoxel incoherent motionKi-67magnetic resonance imagingthyroid nodules

Identifiers

PMID35936691
PMCPMC9354485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.