ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is safe and effective for patients with late-stage or recurrent oral carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We reported the long-term outcomes of transcatheter chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with late-stage or recurrent oral carcinoma. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 18 patients with late-stage or recurrent oral carcinoma between December 2015 and April 2021. The tumor-feeding artery was catheterized, and cisplatin/oxaliplatin and 5-FU/raltitrexed were infused with embolization using polyvinyl alcohol or gelatin sponge. Computed tomography was performed at about 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure, and every 6 months after that. During the procedure and follow-up, procedure outcomes, complications, treatment efficacy, and overall survival were analyzed. Results: A total of 31 sessions of TACE were performed, with a technical success rate of 100%. Of 12 patients combined with oral hemorrhage, two patients showed rebleeding 35 and 37 days later, with a clinical efficiency of hemostasis of 88.9%. Mild complications were observed in 11 patients (61.1%). Severe complications or procedure-related deaths were not observed during or after the procedure. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 20.0% and 86.7%, 38.5% and 61.5%, and 25.0% and 50.0% at 1, 3, and 6 months later, respectively. Seventeen patients (94.4%) were followed up, with a median duration of 37.8 months (IQR 22.3-56.8). Nine patients died of tumor progression, one died of massive rebleeding, and one died of severe lung infection. The median overall survival was 23.8 months. Conclusion: TACE is a safe and effective procedure with minimal invasiveness for treating late-stage or recurrent oral carcinoma. TACE can be recommended as a palliative treatment, particularly for patients with oral hemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.