Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35936510›Full record

ArticleBig data and cognitive computing2022

Optimizations for Computing Relatedness in Biomedical Heterogeneous Information Networks: SemNet 2.0.

Anna Kirkpatrick, Chidozie Onyeze, David Kartchner, Stephen Allegri, Davi Nakajima An, Kevin McCoy, Evie Davalbhakta, Cassie S Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Big data and cognitive computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CompositeView: A Network-Based Visualization Tool.Big data and cognitive computing · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna KirkpatrickLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Chidozie OnyezeLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
David KartchnerLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Stephen AllegriLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Davi Nakajima AnLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Kevin McCoyLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3570-6826
Evie DavalbhaktaLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2933-5966
Cassie S MitchellLaboratory for Pathology Dynamics, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.

Funding

Regulatory and Human Study Operations (RHSO) Core CU19AG065169 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BARNES, CAROL A. · 2021 to 2025
$59.8M
The Goizueta Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG066511 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Amy D Rodriguez · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
The Emory Alzheimer's Disease CenterP50AG025688 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WALKER, LARY C · 2005 to 2019
$25.7M
Inflamm-aging of osteoprogenitor cells: A therapeutic target for improved bone healing - Resubmission - 1 - Revision - 3R01AG056169 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LEUCHT, PHILIPP · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
A Big Data Approach to BCR ABL LeukemiasR21CA232249 · NCI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MITCHELL, CASSIE S · 2019 to 2020
$358k
Inflamm-aging of osteoprogenitor cells: A therapeutic target for improved bone healingR56AG056169 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LEUCHT, PHILIPP · 2023 to 2023
$347k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA232249NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066511NIA NIH HHS P50 AG025688NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056169NIA NIH HHS R56 AG056169NIA NIH HHS U19 AG065169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature-based discovery (LBD) summarizes information and generates insight from large text corpuses. The SemNet framework utilizes a large heterogeneous information network or "knowledge graph" of nodes and edges to compute relatedness and rank concepts pertinent to a user-specified target. SemNet provides a way to perform multi-factorial and multi-scalar analysis of complex disease etiology and therapeutic identification using the 33+ million articles in PubMed. The present work improves the efficacy and efficiency of LBD for end users by augmenting SemNet to create SemNet 2.0. A custom Python data structure replaced reliance on Neo4j to improve knowledge graph query times by several orders of magnitude. Additionally, two randomized algorithms were built to optimize the HeteSim metric calculation for computing metapath similarity. The unsupervised learning algorithm for rank aggregation (ULARA), which ranks concepts with respect to the user-specified target, was reconstructed using derived mathematical proofs of correctness and probabilistic performance guarantees for optimization. The upgraded ULARA is generalizable to other rank aggregation problems outside of SemNet. In summary, SemNet 2.0 is a comprehensive open-source software for significantly faster, more effective, and user-friendly means of automated biomedical LBD. An example case is performed to rank relationships between Alzheimer's disease and metabolic co-morbidities.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasebiomedical knowledge graphHeteSimmachine learningnatural language processingrank aggregationrelatednessSemNettext miningULARA

Identifiers

PMID35936510
PMCPMC9351549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.