Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35936250›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2022

Grounding the Attentional Boost Effect in Events and the Efficient Brain.

Khena M Swallow, Adam W Broitman, Elizabeth Riley, Hamid B Turker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural Activity Differentiates Novel and Learned Event Boundaries.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Khena M SwallowDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Adam W BroitmanDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Elizabeth RileyDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Hamid B TurkerDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

Funding

Canary in a coal mine: locus coeruleus, norepinephrine signaling and dementiaF32AG058479 · NIA · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI RILEY, ELIZABETH B · 2018 to 2021
$286k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG058479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention and memory for everyday experiences vary over time, wherein some moments are better attended and subsequently better remembered than others. These effects have been demonstrated in naturalistic viewing tasks with complex and relatively uncontrolled stimuli, as well as in more controlled laboratory tasks with simpler stimuli. For example, in the

Indexed as

attentional boost effectepisodic memoryevent cognitionlocus coeruleuspredictive codingtemporal selection

Identifiers

PMID35936250
PMCPMC9355572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.