Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35936209›Full record

ArticleSafety and health at work2022

Veterinarians as a Risk Group for Zoonoses: Exposure, Knowledge and Protective Practices in Finland.

Paula M Kinnunen, Alisa Matomäki, Marie Verkola, Annamari Heikinheimo, Olli Vapalahti, Hannimari Kallio-Kokko, Anna-Maija Virtala, Pikka Jokelainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety and health at work, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pet animals as reservoirs for spreading methicillin-resistantJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paula M KinnunenDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Alisa MatomäkiDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Marie VerkolaDepartment of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Annamari HeikinheimoDepartment of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Olli VapalahtiDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Hannimari Kallio-KokkoHUS Diagnostic Center, HUSLAB, Clinical Microbiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.
Anna-Maija VirtalaDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Pikka JokelainenDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Veterinarians may encounter a variety of zoonotic pathogens in their work. Methods: We conducted two cross-sectional questionnaire studies among veterinarians in Finland. Participants were recruited during two Annual Veterinary Congresses. In 2009, 306 veterinarians participated in an extensive questionnaire study, and in 2016, 262 veterinarians participated in a more focused study that included two same questions. Results: In 2009, the majority (90.9%) of the participating veterinarians reported having been occupationally exposed to zoonotic pathogens. Zoonotic infections (15.0%), needle stick incidents (78.8%), bites (85.0%), as well as infected skin lesions (24.2%) were reported. In 2009, 8.2% of the participants fully agreed with the statement "I have good knowledge of zoonoses and their prevention"; in 2016, the proportion was 10.3%. The reported use of protective practices and personal protective equipment in connection with specific veterinary procedures indicated that there was room for improvement, particularly in protection from pathogens that are transmissible via inhalation and mucous membranes. Conclusion: The results confirm that veterinarians are commonly occupationally exposed to zoonotic pathogens. Education should aim to improve and maintain the knowledge of zoonoses and their prevention. Use of protective practices should be advocated.

Indexed as

Occupational healthPersonal protective equipmentZoonotic infections

Identifiers

PMID35936209
PMCPMC9346934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.