ArticleCureus2022
Ten-Year Review of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the frequency and management outcome of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) in Lady Reading Hospital.
methodsThis was a retrospective observational study at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from January 2011 to December 2021. Hospital records of all patients with GTD were reviewed and all were included in this study except those with an incomplete record or unconfirmed histology. Treatment was analysed in terms of surgical, chemotherapy or no treatment, and outcomes were noted in terms of complete remission, disease persistence or death.
resultsIn 10 years 353 patients were admitted with GTD, and the frequency of the disease was 3.72 cases per 1000 pregnancies. The most frequent lesions were complete mole 65.2% (n=230) followed by invasive mole 20.4% (n=72). Mortality rate was 0.56% (n=2). Maternal blood group analysis revealed that B positive 28.3% (n=100) was more frequent. O positive blood group was found more in the malignant form of the disease at 3.96% (n=14). GTD was most prevalent in 21 to 30 years of age (41.4%, n=146). Regarding treatment, in 69.97% (n=247) of cases, suction and evacuation were performed, in 4.2% (n=15) of cases hysterectomy was performed as primary therapy, and 4.8% (17) needed hysterectomy for chemoresistance. In this study 42.49% (n=150) were given single-agent chemotherapy and 4.8% (n=17) were given multi-agent therapy. We had 21.33% (32) patients with a risk score of 7-9. In the group with a risk score of 7-9, 15.62% (n=5) patients were directly started on multi-agent therapy because of evidence of metastasis or choriocarcinoma; the remaining 84.37% (n=27) of patients who had no evidence of metastasis, no prior chemotherapy, no choriocarcinoma and International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage 1 were given single-agent methotrexate with folinic acid (eight days) after informed consent. In 18.75% of patients (n=6) hysterectomy was performed as the primary treatment either for haemorrhage or with age > 40, family completed, or reluctance to undergo chemotherapy. They all had a complete cure. In 3.1% (n=1) of cases, resistance to single-agent therapy was found and multi-agent treatment was started. Overall, in 96.29% of patients, complete remission was achieved with single-agent therapy in patients with risk scores of 7-9.
conclusionThe frequency of GTD was 3.4/1000 pregnancies. Complete mole was the most frequent lesion, and single-agent chemotherapy had a good outcome in low- and high-risk patients with a risk score of 7-9 (with no evidence of metastasis, prior chemotherapy, or choriocarcinoma and FIGO stage 1).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.