ArticleEngineering in life sciences2022
Assessment of microbial activity by CO
Article in Engineering in life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthetic bacterial consortium for degradation of plastic pyrolysis oil waste: experimental optimization and neural network modeling.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Upcycling Oat Hulls via Solid-State Fermentation Using Edible Filamentous Fungi: A Co-Culture Approach withJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Characterization of isolates used in bacterial-based strategies for accelerated carbonation of lime mortars.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Using COBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Evaluating microbial contaminations of alternative heating oils.Engineering in life sciences · 2023Article
- Sensors in a Flash! Oxygen Nanosensors for Microbial Metabolic Monitoring Synthesized by Flash Nanoprecipitation.ACS sensors · 2022Article
- Assessment of microbial activity by COEngineering in life sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial activity is the driving force of the carbon cycle, including the digestion of biomass in the soil, oceans, and oil deposits. This natural diversity of microbial carbon sources poses challenges for humans. Contamination monitoring can be difficult in oil tanks and similar settings. To assess microbial activity in such industrial settings, off-gas analysis can be employed by considering growth and non-growth-associated metabolic activity. In this work, we describe the monitoring of CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.