Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Effectiveness and Waning of Protection With Different SARS-CoV-2 Primary and Booster Vaccines During the Delta Pandemic Wave in 2021 in Hungary (HUN-VE 3 Study).

Zoltán Vokó, Zoltán Kiss, György Surján, Orsolya Surján, Zsófia Barcza, István Wittmann, Gergő Attila Molnár, Dávid Nagy, Veronika Müller, Krisztina Bogos and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Zoltán VokóCenter for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán KissSecond Department of Medicine and Nephrology-Diabetes Center, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
György SurjánMinistry of Human Resources, Budapest, Hungary.
Orsolya SurjánDepartment of Deputy Chief Medical Officer II., National Public Health Center, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsófia BarczaSyntesia Medical Communications Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
István WittmannSecond Department of Medicine and Nephrology-Diabetes Center, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
Gergő Attila MolnárSecond Department of Medicine and Nephrology-Diabetes Center, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
Dávid NagyCenter for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Veronika MüllerDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Krisztina BogosDepartment of Pulmonology, National Korányi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter NagyDepartment of Molecular Immunology and Toxicology and the National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
István KenesseyDepartment of Molecular Immunology and Toxicology and the National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
András WéberDepartment of Molecular Immunology and Toxicology and the National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Lőrinc PolivkaDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Mihály PálosiNational Health Insurance Fund, Budapest, Hungary.
János SzlávikDepartment of Infectology South-Pest Hospital Centre - National Institute for Infectology and Haematology, Budapest, Hungary.
György RokszinSecond Department of Medicine and Nephrology-Diabetes Center, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
Cecília MüllerDepartment of Chief Medical Officer, National Public Health Center, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán SzekaneczDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Miklós KáslerMinistry of Human Resources, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUUniversity of Pecs · HUNational Institute of Oncology · HUNational Public Health and Medical Officer Service · HUNational Center for Epidemiology · HUOrszágos Korányi Tbc és Pulmonológiai Intézet · HUSyreon Research Institute (Hungary)University of Debrecen · HUUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HU

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In late 2021, the pandemic wave was dominated by the Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant in Hungary. Booster vaccines were offered for the vulnerable population starting from August 2021. Methods: The nationwide HUN-VE 3 study examined the effectiveness and durability of primary immunization and single booster vaccinations in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection, Covid-19 related hospitalization and mortality during the Delta wave, compared to an unvaccinated control population without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: The study population included 8,087,988 individuals who were 18-100 years old at the beginning of the pandemic. During the Delta wave, after adjusting for age, sex, calendar day, and chronic diseases, vaccine effectiveness (VE) of primary vaccination against registered SARS-CoV-2 infection was between 11% to 77% and 18% to 79% 14-120 days after primary immunization in the 16-64 and 65-100 years age cohort respectively, while it decreased to close to zero in the younger age group and around 40% or somewhat less in the elderly after 6 months for almost all vaccine types. In the population aged 65-100 years, we found high, 88.1%-92.5% adjusted effectiveness against Covid-19 infection after the Pfizer-BioNTech, and 92.2%-95.6% after the Moderna booster dose, while Sinopharm and Janssen booster doses provided 26.5%-75.3% and 72.9%-100.0% adjusted VE, respectively. Adjusted VE against Covid-19 related hospitalization was high within 14-120 days for Pfizer-BioNTech: 76.6%, Moderna: 83.8%, Sputnik-V: 78.3%, AstraZeneca: 73.8%, while modest for Sinopharm: 45.7% and Janssen: 26.4%. The waning of protection against Covid-19 related hospitalization was modest and booster vaccination with mRNA vaccines or the Janssen vaccine increased adjusted VE up to almost 100%, while the Sinopharm booster dose proved to be less effective. VE against Covid-19 related death after primary immunization was high or moderate: for Pfizer-BioNTech: 81.5%, Moderna: 93.2%, Sputnik-V: 100.0%, AstraZeneca: 84.8%, Sinopharm: 58.6%, Janssen: 53.3%). VE against this outcome also showed a moderate decline over time, while booster vaccine types restored effectiveness up to almost 100%, except for the Sinopharm booster. Conclusions: The HUN-VE 3 study demonstrated waning VE with all vaccine types for all examined outcomes during the Delta wave and confirmed the outstanding benefit of booster vaccination with the mRNA or Janssen vaccines, and this is the first study to provide clear and comparable effectiveness results for six different vaccine types after primary immunization against severe during the Delta pandemic wave.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansHungaryInfantMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Young AdultVaccinesbooster vaccineCovid-19delta variantjanssensinopharmsputnik-Vvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID35935993
PMCPMC9353007
OpenAlexW4286447761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.