Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935917›Full record

ArticleCell genomics2022

Three decades of ethical, legal, and social implications research: Looking back to chart a path forward.

Deanne Dunbar Dolan, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Mildred K Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. On Minimizing Risk and Harm in the Use of Psychedelics.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The Pitfalls of Genomic Data Diversity.The Hastings Center report · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deanne Dunbar DolanCenter for ELSI Resources and Analysis (CERA), Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
Sandra Soo-Jin LeeDivision of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities & Ethics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Mildred K ChoDepartments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

ELSIhub: National Center for ELSI Resources and AnalysisU24HG010733 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mildred K. Cho, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee · 2019 to 2026
$13.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG010733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than thirty years ago in the United States, the National Center for Human Genome Research (NCHGR) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and its partner in the Human Genome Project (HGP), the Department of Energy (DOE), called for proposals from social scientists, ethicists, lawyers, and others to explore the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of mapping and sequencing the human genome. Today, nearly twenty years after the completion of the HGP, the ELSI Research Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) continues this support. It has fostered the growth of ELSI research into a global field of study, uniquely positioned at the nexus of many academic disciplines and in proximity to basic and applied scientific research. We examine the formation of the first ELSI program and consider whether science policy in the public interest can exist within the confines of a set-aside from the NHGRI budget.

Identifiers

PMID35935917
PMCPMC9352173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.