Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935909›Full record

ArticleArab journal of urology2022

Repeated microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: Outcome and predictive factors.

Ibrahim Fathi Ghalayini, Rami Alazab, Omar Halalsheh, Alia H Al-Mohtaseb, Mohammed A Al-Ghazo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arab journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ibrahim Fathi GhalayiniUrology Division, King Abdullah University Hospital/Jordan University of Science and Technology, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0851-6920
Rami AlazabUrology Division, King Abdullah University Hospital/Jordan University of Science and Technology, Amman, Jordan.
Omar HalalshehUrology Division, King Abdullah University Hospital/Jordan University of Science and Technology, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5704-5897
Alia H Al-MohtasebPathology and Laboratory Department, King Abdullah University Hospital/Jordan University of Science and Technology, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3386-1141
Mohammed A Al-GhazoUrology Division, King Abdullah University Hospital/Jordan University of Science and Technology, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1935-8534
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of repeated sperm recovery in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), as little is known about the extraction rate in repeated microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) in these patients. Patients and Methods: A total of 134 men with NOA had their first sperm recovery between January 2013 and February 2020. Repeated microTESE had been done mostly for patients with a successful initial retrieval. Results: In the 323 procedures performed on the 134 men with NOA, sperm could be retrieved in 236 procedures (73.1%). A total of 88, 61 and 40 men underwent two, three and four sperm retrievals, respectively. In these cycles, sperm could be extracted in 65 (73.9%), 53 (86.9%) and 37 (92.5%) men, respectively. During the first microTESE procedure, sperm could be extracted in 81 (60.4%) men with NOA. In all, the success rate was significantly different between subgroups, showing highest rate in hypospermatogenesis cases (95.6%), followed by maturation arrest (58.5%), and Sertoli cell-only syndrome (56.0%). However, this difference was not significant at the third and fourth repeated microTESE. The FSH levels and testicular volume were among the noticeable factors affecting success of sperm retrieval. The duration between the first and second biopsies significantly increased the success rate by a factor of 1.3-fold/month; however, afterwards, the duration did not play any role in the success of microTESE. The success of previous trial significantly increased the probability of success by 10.1-fold in the second trial, 5.6-fold in the third trial, and 16.5 folds in the fourth. Conclusion: Repeated MD -TESE ensures a high sperm recovery rate in patients with NOA. These data also show that when no spermatozoa can be obtained after thawing cryopreserved testicular sperm for ICSI in NOA patients, a repeat microTESE procedure can be planned. Abbreviations: ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF: in vitro fertilisation; MA: maturation arrest; (N)OA: (non-)obstructive azoospermia; OR: odds ratio; SCOS, Sertoli cell-only syndrome; SRR: spermatozoa retrieval rate; (micro)TESE: (microdissection) testicular sperm extraction.

Indexed as

Azoospermiarepeated teseTESEtesticular sperm

Identifiers

PMID35935909
PMCPMC9354641
OpenAlexW4207075179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.