ArticleArab journal of urology2022
Repeated microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: Outcome and predictive factors.
Article in Arab journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can Hormonal Therapy Improve the Outcomes of mTESE in Patients With Non-Obstructive Azoospermia?Andrology · 2026Article
- Exploratory Evaluation of Combined Hormonal Indices in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Diagnostic Performance and Prediction of TESE Success.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Biological and clinical factors predicting sperm retrieval success in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Review
- Global Andrology Forum (GAF) Clinical Guidelines on the Management of Non-obstructive Azoospermia: Bridging the Gap between Controversy and Consensus.The world journal of men's health · 2026Article
- Predictors of sperm retrieval success in first-time and repeated Micro-TESE for nonobstructive azoospermia.Future science OA · 2025Article
- Article
- Second chance in fertility: a comprehensive narrative review of redo micro-TESE outcomes after initial failure.Asian journal of andrology · 2025Review
- Clinical predictors of successful outcomes for couples with nonobstructive azoospermic male partners undergoing micro-TESE.Asian journal of andrology · 2025Review
- A review of testicular histopathology in nonobstructive azoospermia.Asian journal of andrology · 2025Review
- AI predictive models and advancements in microdissection testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic scoping review.Human reproduction open · 2025Article
- Sertoli cells-only syndrome: current clinical approaches and ongoing research trends.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Global Practice Patterns and Variations in the Medical and Surgical Management of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Results of a World-Wide Survey, Guidelines and Expert Recommendations.The world journal of men's health · 2025Article
- Role of Follicle-stimulating Hormone, Inhibin B, and Anti-Müllerian Hormone in Predicting Sperm Retrieval from Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.European urology open science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the feasibility of repeated sperm recovery in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), as little is known about the extraction rate in repeated microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) in these patients. Patients and Methods: A total of 134 men with NOA had their first sperm recovery between January 2013 and February 2020. Repeated microTESE had been done mostly for patients with a successful initial retrieval. Results: In the 323 procedures performed on the 134 men with NOA, sperm could be retrieved in 236 procedures (73.1%). A total of 88, 61 and 40 men underwent two, three and four sperm retrievals, respectively. In these cycles, sperm could be extracted in 65 (73.9%), 53 (86.9%) and 37 (92.5%) men, respectively. During the first microTESE procedure, sperm could be extracted in 81 (60.4%) men with NOA. In all, the success rate was significantly different between subgroups, showing highest rate in hypospermatogenesis cases (95.6%), followed by maturation arrest (58.5%), and Sertoli cell-only syndrome (56.0%). However, this difference was not significant at the third and fourth repeated microTESE. The FSH levels and testicular volume were among the noticeable factors affecting success of sperm retrieval. The duration between the first and second biopsies significantly increased the success rate by a factor of 1.3-fold/month; however, afterwards, the duration did not play any role in the success of microTESE. The success of previous trial significantly increased the probability of success by 10.1-fold in the second trial, 5.6-fold in the third trial, and 16.5 folds in the fourth. Conclusion: Repeated MD -TESE ensures a high sperm recovery rate in patients with NOA. These data also show that when no spermatozoa can be obtained after thawing cryopreserved testicular sperm for ICSI in NOA patients, a repeat microTESE procedure can be planned. Abbreviations: ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF: in vitro fertilisation; MA: maturation arrest; (N)OA: (non-)obstructive azoospermia; OR: odds ratio; SCOS, Sertoli cell-only syndrome; SRR: spermatozoa retrieval rate; (micro)TESE: (microdissection) testicular sperm extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.