Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935895›Full record

ArticlePersoonia2021

Redefining species limits in the

N Yilmaz, M Sandoval-Denis, L Lombard, C M Visagie, B D Wingfield, P W Crous

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Persoonia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Members of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. First Report ofPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Bioactive Potentials of Endophytic FungusInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diversity of fungicolous fungi associated withFungal systematics and evolution · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  14. First Report ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Three new species ofMycoKeys · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

N YilmazDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, P. Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa.
M Sandoval-DenisWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
L LombardWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C M VisagieDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, P. Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa.
B D WingfieldDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, P. Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa.
P W CrousDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, P. Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The

Indexed as

epitypificationfungal taxonomymorphologyneotypificationnew taxavalidation

Identifiers

PMID35935895
PMCPMC9311392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.