ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
External validation based on transfer learning for diagnosing atelectasis using portable chest X-rays.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- XTC-Net: an explainable hybrid model for automated atelectasis detection from chest radiographs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although there has been a large amount of research focusing on medical image classification, few studies have focused specifically on the portable chest X-ray. To determine the feasibility of transfer learning method for detecting atelectasis with portable chest X-ray and its application to external validation, based on the analysis of a large dataset. Methods: From the intensive care chest X-ray medical information market (MIMIC-CXR) database, 14 categories were obtained using natural language processing tags, among which 45,808 frontal chest radiographs were labeled as "atelectasis," and 75,455 chest radiographs labeled "no finding." A total of 60,000 images were extracted, including positive images labeled "atelectasis" and positive X-ray images labeled "no finding." The data were categorized into "normal" and "atelectasis," which were evenly distributed and randomly divided into three cohorts (training, validation, and testing) at a ratio of about 8:1:1. This retrospective study extracted 300 X-ray images labeled "atelectasis" and "normal" from patients in ICUs of The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, which was labeled as an external dataset for verification in this experiment. Data set performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values derived from transfer learning training. Results: It took 105 min and 6 s to train the internal training set. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.57, 75.10, 88.30, and 81.70%. Compared with the external validation set, the obtained AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 98.39, 70.70, 100, and 86.90%. Conclusion: This study found that when detecting atelectasis, the model obtained by transfer training with sufficiently large data sets has excellent external verification and acculturate localization of lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.