Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935758›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Human IgG antibody responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral antigens receptor-binding domain, spike, and nucleocapsid, in vaccinated adults from Merida, Mexico.

Henry Puerta-Guardo, Manuel Parra-Cardeña, Fernando Peña-Miranda, Felipe Flores-Quintal, Pilar Granja-Pérez, Salha Villanueva-Jorge, Refugio González-Losa, Laura Conde-Ferraez, Jesus Gómez-Carballo, Gonzalo Vazquez-Prokopec and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Henry Puerta-GuardoCentro de Investigaciones Regionales Dr. Hideyo Noguchi, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Mexico.
Manuel Parra-CardeñaCentro de Investigaciones Regionales Dr. Hideyo Noguchi, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Mexico.
Fernando Peña-MirandaLaboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública, Servicios de Salud de Yucatán, Mérida, Mexico.
Felipe Flores-QuintalLaboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública, Servicios de Salud de Yucatán, Mérida, Mexico.
Pilar Granja-PérezLaboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública, Servicios de Salud de Yucatán, Mérida, Mexico.
Salha Villanueva-JorgeLaboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública, Servicios de Salud de Yucatán, Mérida, Mexico.
Refugio González-LosaCentro de Investigaciones Regionales Dr. Hideyo Noguchi, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Mexico.
Laura Conde-FerraezCentro de Investigaciones Regionales Dr. Hideyo Noguchi, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Mexico.
Jesus Gómez-CarballoCentro de Investigaciones Regionales Dr. Hideyo Noguchi, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Mexico.
Gonzalo Vazquez-ProkopecDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
James T EarnestDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Pablo Manrique-SaideUnidad Colaborativa para Bioensayos Entomológicos, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Mexico.
Guadalupe Ayora-TalaveraCentro de Investigaciones Regionales Dr. Hideyo Noguchi, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Mexico.
Autonomous University of Yucatán · MXInstituto de Salud del Estado de México · MXEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been approved for controlling the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic worldwide. Antibody response is essential to understand the immune response to different viral targets after vaccination with different vaccine platforms. Thus, the main aim of this study was to describe how vaccination with two distinct SARS-CoV-2 vaccine preparations elicit IgG antibody specific responses against two antigenically relevant SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins: the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and the full-length spike (S). To do so, SARS-CoV-2 protein specific in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were standardized and tested against serum samples collected from 89 adults, recipients of either a single-dose of the Spike-encoding mRNA-based Pfizer/BioNTech (Pf-BNT) (70%, 62/89) or the Spike-encoding-Adenovirus-5-based CanSino Biologics Inc. (CSBIO) (30%, 27/89) in Merida, Mexico. Overall, we identified an IgG seroconversion rate of 88% (68/78) in all vaccinees after more than 25 days post-vaccination (dpv). Anti-RBD IgG-specific responses ranged from 90% (46/51) in the Pf-BNT vaccine at 25 dpv to 74% (20/27) in the CSBIO vaccine at 42 dpv. Compared to the S, the RBD IgG reactivity was significantly higher in both Pf-BNT (

Indexed as

CanSinoIgG responsePfizerSARS-CoV-2 antigensvaccinees

Identifiers

PMID35935758
PMCPMC9354829
OpenAlexW4286488826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.