Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935677›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2022

Unsupervised Plot-Scale LAI Phenotyping via UAV-Based Imaging, Modelling, and Machine Learning.

Qiaomin Chen, Bangyou Zheng, Karine Chenu, Pengcheng Hu, Scott C Chapman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Retrieving rice (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiaomin ChenSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-8896
Bangyou ZhengAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-0970
Karine ChenuThe University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7273-2057
Pengcheng HuSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7958-1407
Scott C ChapmanSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4732-8452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput phenotyping has become the frontier to accelerate breeding through linking genetics to crop growth estimation, which requires accurate estimation of leaf area index (LAI). This study developed a hybrid method to train the random forest regression (RFR) models with synthetic datasets generated by a radiative transfer model to estimate LAI from UAV-based multispectral images. The RFR models were evaluated on both (i) subsets from the synthetic datasets and (ii) observed data from two field experiments (i.e., Exp16, Exp19). Given the parameter ranges and soil reflectance are well calibrated in synthetic training data, RFR models can accurately predict LAI from canopy reflectance captured in field conditions, with systematic overestimation for LAI<2 due to background effect, which can be addressed by applying background correction on original reflectance map based on vegetation-background classification. Overall, RFR models achieved accurate LAI prediction from background-corrected reflectance for Exp16 (correlation coefficient (

Identifiers

PMID35935677
PMCPMC9317541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.