Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935675›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2022

End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].

Andrew Papworth, Julia Hackett, Bryony Beresford, Fliss Murtagh, Helen Weatherly, Sebastian Hinde, Andre Bedendo, Gabriella Walker, Jane Noyes, Sam Oddie and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. End of life care in paediatric settings: UK national survey.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew PapworthDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3244-2634
Julia HackettDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Bryony BeresfordMartin House Research Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Fliss MurtaghHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1289-3726
Helen WeatherlyCentre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9117-6452
Sebastian HindeCentre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Andre BedendoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Gabriella WalkerParent Advisory Panel Member, York, UK.
Jane NoyesSchool of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Fron Heulog, Bangor, LL57 2EF, UK.
Sam OddieBradford Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Chakrapani VasudevanBradford Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Richard FeltbowerLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1728-9408
Bob PhillipsCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UK, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4938-9673
Richard HainAll-Wales Paediatric Palliative Care Network, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5838-1713
Gayathri SubramanianManchester University National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Andrew HaynesDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-629X
Lorna K FraserDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
University of York · GBNational Health Service · GBBangor University · GBCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBUniversity of Hull · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR129213Medical Research Council G0800472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although child mortality has decreased over the last few decades, around 4,500 infants and children die in the UK every year, many of whom require palliative care. There is, however, little evidence on paediatric end-of-life care services. The current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance provides recommendations about what should be offered, but these are based on low quality evidence. The ENHANCE study aims to identify and investigate the different models of existing end-of-life care provision for infants, children, and young people in the UK, including an assessment of the outcomes and experiences for children and parents, and the cost implications to families and healthcare providers. Methods: This mixed methods study will use three linked workstreams and a cross-cutting health economics theme to examine end-of-life care models in three exemplar clinical settings: infant, children and young adult cancer services (PTCs), paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), and neonatal units (NNUs).Workstream 1 (WS1) will survey current practice in each setting and will result in an outline of the different models of care used. WS2 is a qualitative comparison of the experiences of staff, parents and patients across the different models identified. WS3 is a quantitative assessment of the outcomes, resource use and costs across the different models identified. Discussion: Results from this study will contribute to an understanding of how end-of-life care can provide the greatest benefit for children at the end of their lives. It will also allow us to understand the likely benefits of additional funding in end-of-life care in terms of patient outcomes.

Indexed as

end-of-lifemixed methodspaediatricpalliative care

Identifiers

PMID35935675
PMCPMC7613236
OpenAlexW4280601625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.