Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935562›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2022

The prognostic role of surgery and a nomogram to predict the survival of stage IV breast cancer patients.

Xinran Liu, Chengshi Wang, Yu Feng, Chaoyong Shen, Tao He, Zhu Wang, Linjie Ma, Zhenggui Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinran Liu *Clinical Research Center for Breast Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chengshi Wang *Clinical Research Center for Breast Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yu FengClinical Research Center for Breast Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chaoyong ShenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Tao HeClinical Research Center for Breast Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhu WangClinical Research Center for Breast Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Linjie MaSichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Zhenggui DuClinical Research Center for Breast Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since numerous retrospective studies and prospective trials have shown divergent results, whether the surgical excision of the primary tumor results in survival benefits for Methods: We analyzed the data of 2,747 metastatic breast cancer patients (the surgery group) and 4,508 patients (the non-surgery group) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 2010-2015. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to attain a balance between the covariates of both groups. We then assessed the potential risk factors for the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of patients in the non-surgery group by Cox regression and constructed a nomogram to predict BCSS. All the patients were classified into different risk groups based on the median risk score obtained from the nomogram. The hazard ratios of BCSS and overall survival (OS) of patients in the two groups were calculated. Results: After PSM, 2,288 patients severally in the two groups (the surgery group and the non-surgery group) were enrolled in the study. A nomogram incorporating 13 potential risk factors (i.e., age, race, cohabitation status, income, tumor grade, histotype, tumor size, lymph node status, molecular subtype, metastasis to brain, liver, lung, and chemotherapy) was constructed using the data of patients in the non-surgery group. The C statistics for the internal (patients in the non-surgery group) and external (patients in the surgery group) validation of the nomogram were 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-0.71] and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.72-0.74), respectively. In the low-risk group, patients in the surgery group had lower risks of breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) (hazard ratio =0.53; 95% CI, 0.47-0.59; P for interaction =0.014) and overall mortality (OM) (hazard ratio =0.52; 95% CI, 0.46-0.58; P for interaction =0.002) than those in the non-surgery group. Conclusions: Breast surgery might improve the survival of metastatic breast cancer patients in the low-risk group. The established nomogram could provide a reference for clinicians in enabling personalized treatment among advanced breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

breast cancerMetastasisnomogramsurgery

Identifiers

PMID35935562
PMCPMC9346227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.