ArticleGland surgery2022
The use of indocyanine green as the only tracer for the identification of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer: safety and feasibility.
Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence and Technetium-99m for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Indocyanine Green as a Single Tracer for Axillary Staging in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- From Gamma Rays to Green Light: Comparative Efficacy of Indocyanine Green and Technetium-99m in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
- Indocyanine Green Marking of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Early Breast Cancer.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy by Blue Dye Conjunction With Indocyanine Green or Radioisotope in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Prospective Single-Center Observational Study.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is now considered the "gold standard" for axillary staging in the treatment of breast cancer. Most of the lymph node mapping experiences have been performed with a radioisotope (albumin-Tc99m) associated or not with the intraoperative injection of a dye, such as Patent-Blue V. Recent studies have shown how the use of indocyanine green (ICG; a drug used for diagnostic use for many years in other sectors) as a fluorescent tracer, allows to obtain alone detection rate of the sentinel lymph node similar or even better, without the risks related to radioactivity and with better use of resources. Methods: From March 2020 to February 2021, 184 patients with breast cancer cN0, candidate for SLNB were enrolled at the Complex Operative Unit (UOC) of Breast Surgery, Breast Unit of the Hospital of Verona. The ICG was injected into the periareolar site and was used the NOVADAQ SPY Elite system (Stryker Results: The sentinel lymph node was detected and removed in 98.3%. The average number of sentinel lymph nodes extracted is 1.527, while the average number of total lymph nodes (TLNs) extracted is 3.375. The sensitivity of the sentinel lymph node detection technique with ICG, turns out to be 100%. Finally, in the literature, lymphatic function decreases with increasing age, reducing the identification rate of the SLN; this is not confirmed in our study. Conclusions: Our study confirms the use of the only ICG tracer for SLNB in cN0 breast cancer, demonstrating that it is a safe, effective and sensitive technique, which also allows to reduce costs, risks and organizational efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.