Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935521›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2022

Asking the Question 'What Matters to You?' in a London Intensive Care Unit.

Harriet Pittaway, Laura White, Karen Turner, Angelique McGillivary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How Has 'What Matters to You' Been Used for Patient Care? A Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  3. Motivational Interviewing is "Journal of patient experience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Harriet PittawayRoyal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Laura WhiteRoyal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Karen TurnerRoyal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Angelique McGillivaryRoyal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: At the heart of the paradigm shift in approach to patient care from paternalism toward shared decision-making lies the international "What Matters To You?" (WMTY) movement. However, WMTY principles are not frequently applied to the critical care setting. The aim of this quality improvement project work was to design and integrate a tool for all patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) that helped answer WMTY. Methods: Using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology across 8 cycles, a multidisciplinary team designed and integrated a bedside poster into the ICU. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected via a bedside audit process on a regular basis during each of the study phases comprising PDSA cycles. Results: Project results confirmed that the introduction of this poster/tool, alongside resource- and staff engagement-focused interventions, enabled the ICU to offer more than 50% of patients a WMTY conversation, as compared to zero at the start of the project. Consistently, 100% of staff surveyed (n=46 over all cycles) felt the posters were a useful addition to the ICU and confirmed they learned something new about their patients that they didn't know already. Conclusions: This novel poster design successfully summarized patients' responses to the question "What matters to you?" for ICU staff and would be transferable to other ICUs.

Indexed as

bedsidedehumanizationintensive care unitpatient experiencePlan-Do-Study-Actquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID35935521
PMCPMC9302912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.